CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,099Vitamin D Research StudiesNutritional Studies and DietBone health and osteoporosis research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis

Open access
Bolland, M. J., Avenell, A., Baron, J. A., Grey, A., MacLennan, G. S., Gamble, G. D., Reid, I. R.·2010·BMJ
DOI 10.1136/bmj.c3691PMC PMC2912459
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether calcium supplements increase the risk of cardiovascular events. DESIGN: Patient level and trial level meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1966-March 2010), reference lists of meta-analyses of calcium supplements, and two clinical trial registries. Initial searches were carried out in November 2007, with electronic database searches repeated in March 2010. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were randomised, placebo controlled trials of calcium supplements (>or=500 mg/day), with 100 or more participants of mean age more than 40 years and study duration more than one year. The lead authors of eligible trials supplied data. Cardiovascular outcomes were obtained from self reports, hospital admissions, and death certificates. RESULTS: 15 trials were eligible for inclusion, five with patient level data (8151 participants, median follow-up 3.6 years, interquartile range 2.7-4.3 years) and 11 with trial level data (11 921 participants, mean duration 4.0 years). In the five studies contributing patient level data, 143 people allocated to calcium had a myocardial infarction compared with 111 allocated to placebo (hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.67, P=0.035). Non-significant increases occurred in the incidence of stroke (1.20, 0.96 to 1.50, P=0.11), the composite end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or sudden death (1.18, 1.00 to 1.39, P=0.057), and death (1.09, 0.96 to 1.23, P=0.18). The meta-analysis of trial level data showed similar results: 296 people had a myocardial infarction (166 allocated to calcium, 130 to placebo), with an increased incidence of myocardial infarction in those allocated to calcium (pooled relative risk 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.59, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Calcium supplements (without coadministered vitamin D) are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction. As calcium supplements are widely used these modest increases in risk of cardiovascular disease might translate into a large burden of disease in the population. A reassessment of the role of calcium supplements in the management of osteoporosis is warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.c3691

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bolland, M. J., Avenell, A., Baron, J. A., Grey, A., MacLennan, G. S., Gamble, G. D., & Reid, I. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Reid, I. R.
ORCID
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-07-29
Volume
341
Issue
jul29 1
Pages
c3691-c3691
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.c3691
PMC
PMC2912459
OpenAlex
W2143921117
Cited by
1,099
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 134 · 2012: 112
FWCI
17.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Scottish Government
  • University of Auckland
  • Fonterra Co-Operative Group
  • Shire
  • Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA098286)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
calcium supplements, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular events, stroke, sudden death, mortality, vitamin D, older adults, cardiovascular risk, individual patient data, risk of bias assessment, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Calcium, Dietary, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Vitamin D, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Stroke, Bone Density Conservation Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review