Multidisciplinary Team Working in Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
Open accessAbstract
Cancer care is increasingly delivered by multidisciplinary teams. Cath Taylor and colleagues argue that stronger evidence is needed of their effectiveness
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) represent the gold standard for complex oncologic decision-making.
“Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) represent the gold standard for complex oncologic decision-making, integrating expertise across multiple disciplines to formulate individualized treatment strategies [7,8].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Implementing multidisciplinary tumor boards in oncology: a narrative review
Mano, M. S., çitaku, F. T., & Barach, P. (2022) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2021-0471 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
How Effective Is the Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Bariatric Surgery?
Bullen, N. L., Parmar, J., Gilbert, J., Clarke, M., Cota, A., & Finlay, I. G. (2019) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-019-03975-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Asoglu, H., Kose, S., Kayim, O., Abaci, A., Khatib, G., Vardar, M. A., Kilic Bagir, E., Gumurdulu, D., Kidi, M. M., Bayram, E., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15124451 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, C., Munro, A. J., Glynne-Jones, R., Griffith, C., Trevatt, P., Richards, M., & Ramirez, A. J.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
- London Cancer (GB)
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, C.
- ORCID
- Trevatt, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-03-23
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- mar23 2
- Pages
- c951-c951
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2023152838
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 44.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Research UK
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- multidisciplinary team, cancer care, evidence base, cancer treatment delivery
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Decision Making, England, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Neoplasms, Patient Care Team, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
