Cited by 59Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationHealthcare Systems and Technology

Implementing multidisciplinary tumor boards in oncology: a narrative review

Open access
Mano, Max S, çitaku, Fadil T, Barach, Paul·2022·Future Oncology

Abstract

The healthcare industry compares unfavorably with other ultra-safe industries such as aviation and nuclear power plants, which address complexity by reducing the vulnerability of a single person and promoting teams and strong systems. A multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is an evidence-based organizational approach to implementing a more effective concept in oncology practice. Studies addressing the correlation between MTBs and cancer outcomes show promising results, and other potential benefits are also addressed. The objectives of this article are to define and characterize MTBs in modern oncology practice, review the current literature on MTBs effectiveness and address challenges to the implementation and maintenance of MTBs. In this commentary-type narrative review, the authors present their opinions and, whenever possible, substantiate recommendations by citing supportive literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/fon-2021-0471

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mano, M. S., çitaku, F. T., & Barach, P.
Affiliations
  • Grupo Oncoclínicas, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Academy of Leadership Sciences Switzerland, Switzerland
  • Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
Venue
Future Oncology
Published
2021-11-17
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
375-384
ISSN
  • 1479-6694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8301
OpenAlex
W3212049759
Cited by
59
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
multidisciplinary tumor board, oncology practice, oncological outcomes, implementation barriers, team-based care, organizational safety, quality of cancer care
MeSH terms
Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Patient Care Team, Evidence-Based Medicine, Interdisciplinary Communication, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review