Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 683

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study

Open access
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J.·2011·BMJ

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a major risk factor for developing sleep apnea syndrome. CPAP is its treatment. Moreover, the use of CPAP may decrease perioperative complications in patients who have to undergo bariatric surgery. - Objective: To study the prevalence of OSAS in morbidly obese subjects. - Methods: We studied all patients who were referred to our unit of sleep disorders with an obesity diagnosis, using the following inclusion criteria: BMI higher than 40, acceptance of polygraphy. All patients answered a clinical questionnaire in order to assess: symptoms of sleep apnea and cardiometabolic comorbidity. Additionally, they all went through a polygraphic or polysomnographic study. The diagnosis of OSA was established with the presence of an AHI higher than 5 and the severity rating was made according to the SEPAR criteria. - Results: In three years we have studied 292 subjects with the stablished criteria, 115 men, 176 women, average age 47.1 +/-14. Average BMI 46.7. SAHS diagnosis was established in 243 cases (83.5% prevalence) of which 54 (22.2%) had mild OSA, 62 (25.5%) moderate OSA, and 127 (52.2%) severe OSA. In patients with OSA, the Epworth test average result was 7.43 +/-4.5 and in terms of comorbidity, 106 patiens had hipertension, 43.6%, 89 had dyslipidemia (36.6%) and 60 had diabetes (24.6%), 11 had had ischemic events (4.7%) and 5 had cerebrovascular disease (2%). - Conclusions: Individuals with morbid obesity have a very high prevalence of OSA in the absence of significant hypersomnolence. The need to treat these patients makes us recommend the routinary performance of polygraphic studies, even in paucisymptomatic patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d4521

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 683

Metadata

Authors
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-08-04
Volume
343
Issue
aug04 2
Pages
d4521-d4521
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2130121832
Cited by
683
References
1
FWCI
98.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.d4521
The paper
Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2011). The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.