Cited by 138Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Recognising and responding to suicidal crisis within family and social networks: qualitative study

Open access
Owens, C., Owen, G., Belam, J., Lloyd, K., Rapport, F., Donovan, J., Lambert, H.·2011·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To shed light on the difficulties faced by relatives, friends, and colleagues in interpreting signs of suicidality and deciding whether and how to intervene. DESIGN: Qualitative study of completed suicides, based on in-depth interviews with multiple informants. SETTING: London, southwest England, and south Wales. PARTICIPANTS: 31 lay informants (one to five for each case), including parents, partners, siblings, friends, and colleagues of 14 cases of suicide in which the deceased was aged 18-34 and was not in contact with secondary mental health services. RESULTS: Informants described both intellectual and emotional barriers to awareness and intervention within the family and social network. They reported that signs and communications of distress were often oblique and difficult to interpret, that they may have disregarded warning signals and focused instead on positive signs, and that, even when they were aware that something was seriously wrong, taking any action at all involved considerable personal risks. CONCLUSIONS: As the suicidal process unfolds, significant others are faced with a highly complex task. Their proximity to the suicidal person and their emotional investment in the relationship make it difficult for them to see what is happening, to say anything to the person or to other members of the network, or to seek help outside the network. Efforts to strengthen the capacity of lay people to play a role in preventing suicide are urgently needed and should be informed by a thorough understanding of these difficulties. They should highlight the ambiguous nature of warning signs and should focus on helping people to acknowledge and overcome their fears about intervening.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d5801

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [7]Luoma JB, Martin CE, Pearson JL. Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 909-16. 12042175 PMC5072576
  2. [8]Kendall M, Murray S, Carduff E, Worth A, Harris F, Lloyd A, et al. Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs. BMJ 2009; 339: 196-9. 19828645
  3. [9]Hawton K, Appleby L, Platt S, Foster T, Cooper J, Malmberg A, et al. The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide: a review of methodological issues. J Affect Disord 1998; 50: 269-76. 9858086
  4. [10]Owens C, Booth N, Briscoe M, Lawrence C, Lloyd K. Suicide outside the care of mental health services: a case-controlled psychological autopsy study. Crisis 2003; 24: 113-21. 14518644
  5. [11]Owens C, Lloyd K, Campbell J. Access to health care prior to suicide: findings from a psychological autopsy study. Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54: 279-81. 15113495 PMC1314853
  6. [12]Owens C, Lambert H, Donovan J, Lloyd K. A qualitative study of help seeking and primary care consultation prior to suicide. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 503-9. 16004734 PMC1472785
  7. [13]Owens C, Lambert H, Lloyd K, Donovan J. Tales of biographical disintegration: how parents make sense of their sons’ suicides. Sociol Health Illn 2008; 30: 237-54. 18290934
  8. [17]McCance T, McKenna H, Boore J. Exploring caring using narrative methodology: an analysis of the approach. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 350-6. 11251722
  9. [18]Cannon S. Social research in stressful settings: difficulties for the sociologist studying the treatment of breast cancer. Sociol Health Illn 1989; 11: 62-77.
  10. [21]Britten N, Jones R, Murphy E, Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice. Oxford University Press, 1995. 7665030
  11. [23]Owens C, Owen G, Lambert H, Donovan J, Belam J, Rapport F, et al. Public involvement in suicide prevention: understanding and strengthening lay responses to distress. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 308. 19698180 PMC2743668
  12. [24]Biddle L, Brock A, Brookes S, Gunnell D. Suicide rates in young men in England and Wales in the 21st century: time trend study. BMJ 2008; 336: 539-42. 18276666 PMC2265363
  13. [25]Gunnell D, Bennewith O, Hawton K, Simkin S, Kapur N. The epidemiology and prevention of suicide by hanging: a systematic review. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34: 433-42. 15659471
  14. [26]Jefferson G. The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter.” J Pragmat 1981; 5: 399-422.
  15. [27]Hale R. Psychoanalysis and suicide: process and typology. In: Briggs S, Lemma A, Crouch W, eds. Relating to self-harm and suicide: psychoanalytic perspectives on practice, theory and prevention. Routledge, 2008.
  16. [28]Davison C, Smith GD, Frankel S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: the implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociol Health Illn 1991; 13: 1-19.
  17. [30]Speight N. ABC of child abuse: non-accidental injury. BMJ 1989; 298: 879-81. 2497833 PMC1836122
  18. [31]Maris R. Social forces in urban suicide. Dorsey Press, 1969.
  19. [32]Maris R. Pathways to suicide: a survey of self-destructive behaviors. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.
  20. [33]Omer H, Alon N. The continuity principle: a unified approach to disaster and trauma. Am J Community Psychol 1994; 22: 273-87. 7977181
  21. [37]Kelly C, Jorm A, Kitchener B, Langlands R. Development of mental health first aid guidelines for suicidal ideation and behaviour: a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry 2008; 18: 17. PMC2324091 18366657
  22. [38]Mellanby R, Hudson N, Allister R, Bell C, Else R, Gunn-Moore D, et al. Evaluation of suicide awareness programmes delivered to veterinary undergraduates and academic staff. Vet Rec 2010; 167: 730-4. 21257507
  23. [39]MacNaughton J. Clinical judgement. In: Jones R, Britten N, Culpepper L, Gass D, Grol R, Mant D, et al, eds. Oxford textbook of primary medical care. Vol 1: principles and concepts. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  24. [40]Rutz W, Knorring L, Walinder J. Frequency of suicide on Gotland after systematic postgraduate education of general practitioners. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989; 80: 151-4. 2801163
  25. [41]Hendin H, Maltsberger J, Lipschitz A, Haas A, Kyle J. Recognizing and responding to a suicide crisis. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2001; 31: 115-28. 11459245
  26. [42]Pescosolido BA. Beyond rational choice: the social dynamics of how people seek help Am J Sociology 1992; 97: 1096-138.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, C., Owen, G., Belam, J., Lloyd, K., Rapport, F., Donovan, J., & Lambert, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Owens, C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-10-18
Volume
343
Issue
oct18 1
Pages
d5801-d5801
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2121321082
Cited by
138
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide, suicidal crisis, family and social networks, suicide prevention, young adults, emotional barriers, relatives of suicide victims
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Communication, Crisis Intervention, Family, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, London, Male, Retrospective Studies, Social Support, Suicide, Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review