Cited by 324Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Product review

Keith E Hawton, Louis Appleby, S Platt, T Foster, Jayne Cooper, A Malmberg, Sue Simkin·1998·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide is becoming an increasingly used research method. It presents considerable methodological problems. In order to assist future researchers in this field and to help readers assess reports of psychological autopsy studies the authors have reviewed these issues on the basis of their own experience and those of other workers. The areas covered include research design, identification of subjects, sources of information and the particular issues concerned with approaching relatives and other informants, choice and recruitment of controls, the difficulties of conducting psychological autopsy interviews with relatives, problems for interviewers, the selection of appropriate measures to obtain information, and achieving valid and reasonably reliable conclusions from diverse information sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00033-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The psychological autopsy approach has limitations including issues relating to the choice (and selective non-response) of control subjects and the reliance on proxy reports, which are prone to recall bias and measurement error.

    “In addition, there are several limitations inherent to the psychological autopsy approach,23–25 including issues relating to the choice (and selective non-response) of control subjects and the reliance on proxy reports—the latter being prone to recall bias and measurement error.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawton, K. E., Appleby, L., Platt, S., Foster, T., Cooper, J., Malmberg, A., & Simkin, S.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
50
Issue
2-3
Pages
269-276
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1732968872
Cited by
324
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 35
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
psychological autopsy, suicide, research design, informant selection, control selection, interview validity, reliability statistics, information sources
MeSH terms
Autopsy, Cause of Death, Data Collection, Family Relations, Humans, Research Design, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review