Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How fast does the Grim Reaper walk? Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis in healthy men aged 70 and over

Open access
Stanaway, F. F., Gnjidic, D., Blyth, F. M., Couteur, D. G. L., Naganathan, V., Waite, L., Seibel, M. J., Handelsman, D. J., Sambrook, P. N., Cumming, R. G.·2011·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the speed at which the Grim Reaper (or Death) walks. DESIGN: Population based prospective study. SETTING: Older community dwelling men living in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 1705 men aged 70 or more participating in CHAMP (Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Walking speed (m/s) and mortality. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve for walking speed and determine the walking speed of the Grim Reaper. The optimal walking speed was estimated using the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity-1), a common summary measure of the receiver operating characteristics curve, and represents the maximum potential effectiveness of a marker. RESULTS: The mean walking speed was 0.88 (range 0.15-1.60) m/s. The highest Youden index (0.293) was observed at a walking speed of 0.82 m/s (2 miles (about 3 km) per hour), corresponding to a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 70% for mortality. Survival analysis showed that older men who walked faster than 0.82 m/s were 1.23 times less likely to die (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.37) than those who walked slower (P = 0.0003). A sensitivity of 1.0 was obtained when a walking speed of 1.36 m/s (3 miles (about 5 km) per hour) or greater was used, indicating that no men with walking speeds of 1.36 m/s or greater had contact with Death. CONCLUSION: The Grim Reaper's preferred walking speed is 0.82 m/s (2 miles (about 3 km) per hour) under working conditions. As none of the men in the study with walking speeds of 1.36 m/s (3 miles (about 5 km) per hour) or greater had contact with Death, this seems to be the Grim Reaper's most likely maximum speed; for those wishing to avoid their allotted fate, this would be the advised walking speed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.d7679

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Stanaway, F. F., Gnjidic, D., Blyth, F. M., Couteur, D. G. L., Naganathan, V., Waite, L., Seibel, M. J., Handelsman, D. J., Sambrook, P. N., & Cumming, R. G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
343
Issue
dec15 1
Pages
d7679-d7679
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2164482359
Cited by
165
References
3
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How fast does the Grim Reaper walk? Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis in healthy men aged 70 and over. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.d7679
The paper
Stanaway, F. F., Gnjidic, D., Blyth, F. M., Couteur, D. G. L., Naganathan, V., Waite, L., Seibel, M. J., Handelsman, D. J., Sambrook, P. N., & Cumming, R. G. (2011). How fast does the Grim Reaper walk? Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis in healthy men aged 70 and over. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7679

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.