The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the presence of kidney stones increase the risk of end stage renal disease (ESRD) or other adverse renal outcomes. DESIGN: A registry cohort study using validated algorithms based on claims and facility utilisation data. Median follow-up of 11 years. SETTING: Alberta, Canada, between 1997 and 2009. PARTICIPANTS: 3,089,194 adult patients without ESRD at baseline or a history of pyelonephritis. Of these, 1,954,836 had outpatient serum creatinine measurements and were included in analyses of chronic kidney disease and doubling of serum creatinine level. EXPOSURE: One or more kidney stones during follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident ESRD, development of stage 3b-5 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), and sustained doubling of serum creatinine concentration from baseline. RESULTS: 23,706 (0.8%) patients had at least one kidney stone, 5333 (0.2%) developed ESRD, 68,525 (4%) developed stage 3b-5 chronic kidney disease, and 6581 (0.3%) experienced sustained doubling of serum creatinine. Overall, one or more stone episodes during follow-up was associated with increased risk of ESRD (adjusted hazard ratio 2.16 (95% CI 1.79 to 2.62)), new stage 3b-5 chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio 1.74 (1.61 to 1.88)), and doubling of serum creatinine (hazard ratio 1.94 (1.56 to 2.43)), all compared with those without kidney stones during follow-up. The excess risk of adverse outcomes associated with at least one episode of stones seemed greater in women than in men, and in people aged <50 years than in those aged ≥ 50. However, the risks of all three adverse outcomes in those with at least one episode of stones were significantly higher than in those without stones in both sexes and age strata. The absolute increase in the rate of adverse renal outcomes associated with stones was small: the unadjusted rate of ESRD was 2.48 per million person days in people with one or more episodes of stones versus 0.52 per million person days in people without stones. CONCLUSION: Even a single kidney stone episode during follow-up was associated with a significant increase in the likelihood of adverse renal outcomes including ESRD. However, the increases were small in absolute terms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excerpts from the US Renal Data System 2009 Annual Data Report
Collins, A. J., Foley, R. N., Herzog, C., Chavers, B. M., Gilbertson, D., Ishani, A., Kasiske, B. L., Liu, J., Mau, L.-W., McBean, M., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.009 · Cited by 436
Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data
Quan, H., Khan, N., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Tu, K., Chen, G., Campbell, N., Hill, M. D., Ghali, W. A., & McAlister, F. A. (2009) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.139279 · Cited by 350
Self-citation
Cited by
Wiebe, N., & Tonelli, M. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298402 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, R. T., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Wiebe, N., Bello, A., Morgan, C., Samuel, S., Klarenbach, S. W., Curhan, G. C., Tonelli, M., & for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-08-29
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- aug29 2
- Pages
- e5287-e5287
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118744783
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.