The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the literature on indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1966 to present), Embase (1974 to present), and Web of Science (1898 to present). STUDY SELECTION: All articles that reported an original effect statistic for indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Articles that presented no data, such as review articles and editorials, were excluded, as were articles in languages other than English. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to summarise the relative risk of ever use versus never use of indoor tanning. Dose-response effects and exposure to indoor tanning during early life were also examined. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States population was calculated. RESULTS: 12 studies with 9328 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer were included. Among people who reported ever using indoor tanning compared with those who never used indoor tanning, the summary relative risk for squamous cell carcinoma was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.17) and that for basal cell carcinoma was 1.29 (1.08 to 1.53). No significant heterogeneity existed between studies. The population attributable risk fraction for the United States was estimated to be 8.2% for squamous cell carcinoma and 3.7% for basal cell carcinoma. This corresponds to more than 170 000 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year attributable to indoor tanning. On the basis of data from three studies, use of indoor tanning before age 25 was more strongly associated with both squamous cell carcinoma (relative risk 2.02, 0.70 to 5.86) and basal cell carcinoma (1.40, 1.29 to 1.52). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor tanning is associated with a significantly increased risk of both basal and squamous cell skin cancer. The risk is higher with use in early life (<25 years). This modifiable risk factor may account for hundreds of thousands of cases of non-melanoma skin cancer each year in the United States alone and many more worldwide. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence on the harms of indoor tanning and support public health campaigns and regulation to reduce exposure to this carcinogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010 · Cited by 17,796
The International Agency for Research on Cancer Working Group on artificial ultraviolet (UV) light and skin cancer (2007) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22453 · Cited by 561
Indoor tanning and risk of early-onset basal cell carcinoma
Ferrucci, L. M., Cartmel, B., Molinaro, A. M., Leffell, D. J., Bale, A. E., & Mayne, S. T. (2012) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.940 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040
Rahib, L., Wehner, M. R., Matrisian, L. M., & Nead, K. T. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4708 · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationPrevalence and Costs of Skin Cancer Treatment in the U.S., 2002−2006 and 2007−2011
Guy, G. P., Machlin, S. R., Ekwueme, D. U., & Yabroff, K. R. (2015) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.036 · Cited by 873
Defining skin aging and its risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Wong, Q. Y. A., & Chew, F. T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01573-z · Cited by 250
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Skin Diseases Due to Particulate Matter
Ngoc, L., Park, D., Lee, Y., & Lee, Y.-C. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph14121458 · Cited by 159
S2k Guidelines for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma – Part 1: Epidemiology, Genetics and Diagnosis
Lang, B. M., Balermpas, P., Bauer, A., Blum, A., Brölsch, G. F., Dirschka, T., Follmann, M., Frank, J., Frerich, B., Fritz, K., et al. (2019) · JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft · doi:10.1111/ddg.13733 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Wehner, M. R., Shive, M. L., Chren, M.-M., Han, J., Qureshi, A. A., & Linos, E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-10-02
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- oct02 3
- Pages
- e5909-e5909
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143017568
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.e5909
- The paper
- Wehner, M. R., Shive, M. L., Chren, M.-M., Han, J., Qureshi, A. A., & Linos, E. (2012). Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.