Cited by 113Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMental Health and PsychiatryMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The new somatic symptom disorder in DSM-5 risks mislabeling many people as mentally ill

Frances, A.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

This new condition suggested in the bible of mental health diagnoses lacks specificity, says Allen Frances

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f1580

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frances, A.
Corresponding author
Frances, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-03-18
Volume
346
Issue
mar18 3
Pages
f1580-f1580
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055812845
Cited by
113
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
somatic symptom disorder, DSM-5, diagnostic criteria, overdiagnosis, diagnostic specificity, psychiatric diagnosis
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Male, Somatoform Disorders, Risk Assessment, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review