Cited by 4Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsBacterial Infections and VaccinesImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Generalisation and extrapolation of study results

Sedgwick, P.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

Background People with severe mental illness have a higher risk than others of some physical diseases. The risk of pneumococcal disease in people with mental disorders is unknown. This is potentially important because vaccines against the pneumococcus are available. Methods We used two datasets of linked hospital admission and death records, the Oxford Record Linkage Study and all-England linked Hospital Episode Statistics, to estimate the risk of lobar pneumonia and other pneumococcal disease (here, all collectively termed pneumococcal disease) in people hospitalised with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression or anxiety. We compared rates of pneumococcal disease in each cohort with rates in a comparison cohort of people without a record of hospitalisation for these psychiatric disorders. Findings The risk of pneumococcal disease in each psychiatric group was significantly high in both datasets. In the English national dataset (spanning 1999–2011), the risk of pneumococcal disease in people hospitalised with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression or anxiety was, respectively, 2.3 (95% CI 2.2 to 2.4), 2.3 (2.2 to 2.3), 2.1 (2.0 to 2.1) and 2.2 (2.1 to 2.2). The risk remained high for years after discharge, suggesting an association with the psychiatric disorder rather than with the event of hospitalisation. Conclusions Severe mental illness is a risk factor for lobar pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia, pneumococcal septicaemia and meningitis. Possible explanations for the elevated risk include factors relating to lifestyle and health-risk activities. If our findings are replicated elsewhere, there would be a case for considering routine pneumococcal immunisation for people with severe mental illness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f3022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Translating medical research to practice rests crucially on the external validity of results, i.e., on the generalizability of findings from study samples to target populations.

    “Translating medical research to practice rests crucially on the external validity of results, i.e., on the generalizability of findings from study samples to target populations [1].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sedgwick, P.
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sedgwick, P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-05-10
Volume
346
Issue
may10 1
Pages
f3022-f3022
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002381194
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BMJ (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Keywords
pneumococcal infection, severe mental illness, lobar pneumonia, pneumococcal sepsis, pneumococcal meningitis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, somatic comorbidity, pneumococcal vaccination, hospitalization, Hospital Episode Statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review