Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study

Open access
Ravi, B., Jenkinson, R., Austin, P. C., Croxford, R., Wasserstein, D., Escott, B., Paterson, J. M., Kreder, H., Hawker, G. A.·2014·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify a cut point in annual surgeon volume associated with increased risk of complications after primary elective total hip arthroplasty and to quantify any risk identified. DESIGN: Propensity score matched cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 37,881 people who received their first primary total hip arthroplasty during 2002-09 and were followed for at least two years after their surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rates of various surgical complications within 90 days (venous thromboembolism, death) and within two years (infection, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, revision) of surgery. RESULTS: Multivariate splines were developed to visualize the relation between surgeon volume and the risk for various complications. A threshold of 35 cases a year was identified, under which there was an increased risk of dislocation and revision. 6716 patients whose total hip arthroplasty was carried out by surgeons who had done ≤ 35 such procedure in the previous year were successfully matched to patients whose surgeon had carried out more than 35 procedures. Patients in the former group had higher rates of dislocation (1.9% v 1.3%, P=0.006; NNH 172) and revision (1.5% v 1.0%, P=0.03; NNH 204). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of first time recipients of total hip arthroplasty, patients whose operation was carried by surgeons who had performed 35 or fewer such procedures in the year before the index procedure were at increased risk for dislocation and early revision. Surgeons should consider performing 35 cases or more a year to minimize the risk for complications. Furthermore, the methods used to visualize the relationship between surgeon volume and the occurrence of complications can be easily applied in any jurisdiction, to help inform and optimize local healthcare delivery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.g3284

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Ravi, B., Jenkinson, R., Austin, P. C., Croxford, R., Wasserstein, D., Escott, B., Paterson, J. M., Kreder, H., & Hawker, G. A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-05-23
Volume
348
Issue
may23 1
Pages
g3284-g3284
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988551945
Cited by
270
References
70
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.g3284
The paper
Ravi, B., Jenkinson, R., Austin, P. C., Croxford, R., Wasserstein, D., Escott, B., Paterson, J. M., Kreder, H., & Hawker, G. A. (2014). Relation between surgeon volume and risk of complications after total hip arthroplasty: propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3284

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.