The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diabetes in Ontario
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Accurate information about the magnitude and distribution of diabetes can inform policy and support health care evaluation. We linked physician service claims (PSCs) and hospital discharge abstracts (HDAs) to determine diabetes prevalence and incidence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A retrospective cohort was constructed using administrative data from the national HDA database, PSCs for Ontario (population 11 million), and registries carrying demographics and vital statistics. All HDAs and PSCs bearing a diagnosis of diabetes (ICD9-CM 250) were selected for 1991–1999. Two previously reported algorithms for identification of diabetes were applied as follows: “1-claim” (any HDA or PSC showing diabetes) and “2-claim” (one HDA or two PSCs within 2 years showing diabetes). Incident cases were defined as individuals who met the criteria for diabetes for the first time after at least 2 years of observation. For validation, diagnostic data abstracted from primary care charts (n=3,317) of 57 randomly selected physicians were linked to the administrative data cohort, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS—In 1998, 696,938 individuals met the 1-claim criteria and 528,280 met the 2-claim criteria. Sensitivity for diabetes was 90 and 86%; for the 1- and 2-claim algorithms, specificity was 92 and 97%, respectively, and positive predictive values were 61 and 80%, respectively. Using the 2-claim algorithm, the all-age prevalence increased from 3.2% in 1993 to 4.5% in 1998 (6.1% in adults). Incidence remained stable. CONCLUSIONS—Administrative data can be used to establish population-based incidence and prevalence of diabetes. Diabetes prevalence is increasing in Ontario and is considerably higher than self-reported rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stamler, J., Vaccaro, O., Neaton, J. D., Wentworth, D., & The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group (1993) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.16.2.434 · Cited by 4,063
Identifying Persons with Diabetes Using Medicare Claims Data
Hebert, P. L., Geiss, L. S., Tierney, E. F., Engelgau, M. M., Yawn, B. P., & McBean, A. M. (1999) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/106286069901400607 · Cited by 403
Cited by
Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bellamy, L., Casas, J.-P., Hingorani, A. D., & Williams, D. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60731-5 · Cited by 3,253
Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study
Juurlink, D. N., Mamdani, M. M., Lee, D. S., Kopp, A., Austin, P. C., Laupacis, A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040135 · Cited by 1,761
Rates and risk factors for prolonged opioid use after major surgery: population based cohort study
Clarke, H., Soneji, N., Ko, D. T., Yun, L., & Wijeysundera, D. N. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1251 · Cited by 940
Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Young Women Following Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Shah, B. R., Retnakaran, R., & Booth, G. L. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc08-0706 · Cited by 489
Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes
Feig, D. S., Zinman, B., Wang, X., & Hux, J. E. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.080012 · Cited by 440
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hux, J. E., Ivis, F., Flintoft, V., & Bica, A.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 512-516
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2078197568
- Cited by
- 1,290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabetes in Ontario. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.25.3.512
- The paper
- Hux, J. E., Ivis, F., Flintoft, V., & Bica, A. (2002). Diabetes in Ontario. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.3.512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.