Cited by 238Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesChild Nutrition and Water AccessPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial

Open access
Ma, X., Zhou, Z., Yi, H., Pang, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Q., Meltzer, M. E., le Cessie, S., He, M., Rozelle, S., Liu, Y., Congdon, N.·2014·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of provision of free glasses on academic performance in rural Chinese children with myopia. DESIGN: Cluster randomized, investigator masked, controlled trial. SETTING: 252 primary schools in two prefectures in western China, 2012-13. PARTICIPANTS: 3177 of 19,934 children in fourth and fifth grades (mean age 10.5 years) with visual acuity <6/12 in either eye without glasses correctable to >6/12 with glasses. 3052 (96.0%) completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomized by school (84 schools per arm) to one of three interventions at the beginning of the school year: prescription for glasses only (control group), vouchers for free glasses at a local facility, or free glasses provided in class. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spectacle wear at endline examination and end of year score on a specially designed mathematics test, adjusted for baseline score and expressed in standard deviations. RESULTS: Among 3177 eligible children, 1036 (32.6%) were randomized to control, 988 (31.1%) to vouchers, and 1153 (36.3%) to free glasses in class. All eligible children would benefit from glasses, but only 15% wore them at baseline. At closeout glasses wear was 41% (observed) and 68% (self reported) in the free glasses group, and 26% (observed) and 37% (self reported) in the controls. Effect on test score was 0.11 SD (95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.21) when the free glasses group was compared with the control group. The adjusted effect of providing free glasses (0.10, 0.002 to 0.19) was greater than parental education (0.03, -0.04 to 0.09) or family wealth (0.01, -0.06 to 0.08). This difference between groups was significant, but was smaller than the prespecified 0.20 SD difference that the study was powered to detect. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of free glasses to Chinese children with myopia improves children's performance on mathematics testing to a statistically significant degree, despite imperfect compliance, although the observed difference between groups was smaller than the study was originally designed to detect. Myopia is common and rarely corrected in this setting.Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03252665.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.g5740

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, X., Zhou, Z., Yi, H., Pang, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Q., Meltzer, M. E., le Cessie, S., He, M., Rozelle, S., Liu, Y., & Congdon, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Congdon, N.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-09-23
Volume
349
Issue
sep23 7
Pages
g5740-g5740
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004108081
Cited by
238
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
myopia, spectacle lenses, academic performance, mathematics scores, rural children, spectacle wear, visual impairment, China, elementary school students, parental education, family wealth
MeSH terms
Child, China, Delivery of Health Care, Educational Status, Eyeglasses, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Myopia, Rural Population, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review