Listen to patients first
Abstract
High death rates galvanised quality improvement and innovative change in one of the Netherland’s largest hospitals, transforming it into a model for patient participation, reports Tessa Richards
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients' stories provide a context and meaning of their health problems, may be a therapeutic intervention in itself, and are important to establish a good doctor-patient relationship.
“The patients’ stories in fact provide a context and meaning of their health problems,49 which may be a therapeutic intervention in itself, and are important to establish a good doctor–patient relationship.50”
Cites
Revolutionising management of chronic disease: the ParkinsonNet approach
Bloem, B. R., & Munneke, M. A. M. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1838 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Dyer, C. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.181 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Should patients be able to control their own records?
Davies, P. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e4905 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sharma, S., Jensen, M. P., Moseley, G. L., & Abbott, J. H. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Liddy, C., Hauteclocque, J., Moroz, I., Oppenheimer, L., Sturge, D., Burns, K. K., Horsley, T., Tuot, D., & Keely, E. (2022) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x20926779 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Richards, T.
- Corresponding author
- Richards, T.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-09-23
- Volume
- 349
- Issue
- sep23 1
- Pages
- g5765-g5765
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088019369
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- patient participation, patient involvement, hospital quality improvement, patient safety, mortality reduction, hospital change, patient engagement
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Patient Participation, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
