Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study

Open access
Ladha, Karim, Vidal Melo, Marcos F, McLean, Duncan J, Wanderer, Jonathan P, Grabitz, Stephanie D, Kurth, Tobias, Eikermann, Matthias·2015·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of intraoperative protective ventilation on major postoperative respiratory complications and to define safe intraoperative mechanical ventilator settings that do not translate into an increased risk of postoperative respiratory complications. DESIGN: Hospital based registry study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care hospital and two affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts, United States. PARTICIPANTS: 69,265 consecutively enrolled patients over the age of 18 who underwent a non-cardiac surgical procedure between January 2007 and August 2014 and required general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: Protective ventilation, defined as a median positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O or more, a median tidal volume of less than 10 mL/kg of predicted body weight, and a median plateau pressure of less than 30 cmH2O. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite outcome of major respiratory complications, including pulmonary edema, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and re-intubation. RESULTS: Of the 69,265 enrolled patients 34,800 (50.2%) received protective ventilation and 34,465 (49.8%) received non-protective ventilation intraoperatively. Protective ventilation was associated with a decreased risk of postoperative respiratory complications in multivariable regression (adjusted odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 0.98, P=0.013). The results were similar in the propensity score matched cohort (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.97, P=0.004). A PEEP of 5 cmH2O and median plateau pressures of 16 cmH2O or less were associated with the lowest risk of postoperative respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative protective ventilation was associated with a decreased risk of postoperative respiratory complications. A PEEP of 5 cmH2O and a plateau pressure of 16 cmH2O or less were identified as protective mechanical ventilator settings. These findings suggest that protective thresholds differ for intraoperative ventilation in patients with normal lungs compared with those used for patients with acute lung injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.h3646

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Ladha, K., Vidal Melo, M. F., McLean, D. J., Wanderer, J. P., Grabitz, S. D., Kurth, T., & Eikermann, M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
351
Pages
h3646
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151898076
Cited by
326
References
41
FWCI
25.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.h3646
The paper
Ladha, K., Vidal Melo, M. F., McLean, D. J., Wanderer, J. P., Grabitz, S. D., Kurth, T., & Eikermann, M. (2015). Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3646

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.