The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental illness, challenging behaviour, and psychotropic drug prescribing in people with intellectual disability: UK population based cohort study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of recorded mental illness and challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability in UK primary care and to explore the prescription of psychotropic drugs in this group. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: 571 general practices contributing data to The Health Improvement Network clinical database. PARTICIPANTS: 33,016 adults (58% male) with intellectual disability who contributed 211,793 person years' data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Existing and new records of mental illness, challenging behaviour, and psychotropic drug prescription. RESULTS: 21% (7065) of the cohort had a record of mental illness at study entry, 25% (8300) had a record of challenging behaviour, and 49% (16,242) had a record of prescription of psychotropic drugs. During follow-up, the rate of new cases of mental illness in people without a history at cohort entry was 262 (95% confidence interval 254 to 271) per 10,000 person years and the rate of challenging behaviour was 239 (231 to 247) per 10,000 person years. The rate of new psychotropic drug prescription in those without a previous history of psychotropic drug treatment was 518 (503 to 533) per 10,000 person years. Rates of new recording of severe mental illness declined by 5% (95% confidence interval 3% to 7%) per year (P<0.001), and new prescriptions of antipsychotics declined by 4% (3% to 5%) per year P<0.001) between 1999 and 2013. New prescriptions of mood stabilisers also decreased significantly. The rate of new antipsychotic prescribing was significantly higher in people with challenging behaviour (incidence rate ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.90 to 2.27; P<0.001), autism (1.79, 1.56 to 2.04; P<0.001), and dementia (1.42, 1.12 to 1.81; P<0.003) and in those of older age, after control for other sociodemographic factors and comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of people with intellectual disability who have been treated with psychotropic drugs far exceeds the proportion with recorded mental illness. Antipsychotics are often prescribed to people without recorded severe mental illness but who have a record of challenging behaviour. The findings suggest that changes are needed in the prescribing of psychotropics for people with intellectual disability. More evidence is needed of the efficacy and safety of psychotropic drugs in this group, particularly when they are used for challenging behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Counseling · doi:10.4135/9781412963978.n182 · Cited by 10,830
Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies
Maulik, P. K., Mascarenhas, M. N., Mathers, C. D., Dua, T., & Saxena, S. (2011) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018 · Cited by 1,770
Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North
Townsend, P. D., Phillimore, P., & Beattie, A. (1987) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 1,473
Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associated factors
Cooper, S.-A., Smiley, E., Morrison, J., Williamson, A., & Allan, L. (2007) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.106.022483 · Cited by 1,336
Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North
Blane, D., Townsend, P., Phillimore, P., & Beattie, A. (1989) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/590279 · Cited by 753
The prevalence of challenging behaviors: a total population study
Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Alborz, A., Reeves, D., Mason, H., Swarbrick, R., Mason, L., & Hatton, C. (2001) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00061-5 · Cited by 698
Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Khan, N. F., Harrison, S. E., & Rose, P. W. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x483562 · Cited by 685
McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x · Cited by 675
Blak, B., Thompson, M., Dattani, H., & Bourke, A. (2011) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820 · Cited by 630
Heslop, P., Blair, P. S., Fleming, P., Hoghton, M., Marriott, A., & Russ, L. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62026-7 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Ralph, S. J., & Espinet, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports · doi:10.3233/adr-170042 · Cited by 160
Chinn, D., & Abraham, E. (2016) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/jir.12274 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheehan, R., Hassiotis, A., Walters, K., Osborn, D., Strydom, A., & Horsfall, L.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-09-01
- Volume
- 351
- Pages
- h4326
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1760794340
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 25.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental illness, challenging behaviour, and psychotropic drug prescribing in people with intellectual disability: UK population based cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.h4326
- The paper
- Sheehan, R., Hassiotis, A., Walters, K., Osborn, D., Strydom, A., & Horsfall, L. (2015). Mental illness, challenging behaviour, and psychotropic drug prescribing in people with intellectual disability: UK population based cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.