Cited by 607Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchFamily and Disability Support ResearchDisability Rights and Representation

The Confidential Inquiry into premature deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in the UK: a population-based study

Open access
Heslop, Pauline, Blair, Peter S, Fleming, Peter, Hoghton, Matthew, Marriott, Anna, Russ, Lesley·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Confidential Inquiry into premature deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in England was commissioned to provide evidence about contributory factors to avoidable and premature deaths in this population. METHODS: The population-based Confidential Inquiry reviewed the deaths of people with intellectual disabilities aged 4 years and older who had been registered with a general practitioner in one of five Primary Care Trust areas of southwest England, who died between June 1, 2010, and May 31, 2012. A network of health, social-care, and voluntary-sector services; community contacts; and statutory agencies notified the Confidential Inquiry of all deaths of people with intellectual disabilities and provided core data. The Office for National Statistics provided data about the coding of individual cause of death certificates. Deaths were described as avoidable (preventable or amenable), according to Office for National Statistics definitions. Contributory factors to deaths were identified and quantified by the case investigator, verified by a local review panel meeting, and agreed by the Confidential Inquiry overview panel. Contributory factors were grouped into four domains: intrinsic to the individual, within the family and environment, care provision, and service provision. The deaths of a comparator group of people without intellectual disabilities but much the same in age, sex, and cause of death and registered at the same general practices as those with intellectual disabilities were also investigated. FINDINGS: The Confidential Inquiry reviewed the deaths of 247 people with intellectual disabilities. Nearly a quarter (22%, 54) of people with intellectual disabilities were younger than 50 years when they died, and the median age at death was 64 years (IQR 52-75). The median age at death of male individuals with intellectual disabilities was 65 years (IQR 54-76), 13 years younger than the median age at death of male individuals in the general population of England and Wales (78 years). The median age at death of female individuals with intellectual disabilities was 63 years (IQR 54-75), 20 years younger than the median age at death for female individuals in the general population (83 years). Avoidable deaths from causes amenable to change by good quality health care were more common in people with intellectual disabilities (37%, 90 of 244) than in the general population of England and Wales (13%). Contributory factors to premature deaths in a subset of people with intellectual disabilities compared with a comparator group of people without intellectual disabilities included problems in advanced care planning (p=0·0003), adherence to the Mental Capacity Act (p=0·0008), living in inappropriate accommodation (p<0·0001), adjusting care as needs changed (p=0·009), and carers not feeling listened to (p=0·006). INTERPRETATION: The Confidential Inquiry provides evidence of the substantial contribution of factors relating to the provision of care and health services to the health disparities between people with and without intellectual disabilities. It is imperative to examine care and service provision for this population as potentially contributory factors to their deaths--factors that can largely be ameliorated. FUNDING: Department of Health for England.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62026-7

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heslop, P., Blair, P. S., Fleming, P., Hoghton, M., Marriott, A., & Russ, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Clevedon Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Heslop, Pauline
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
383
Issue
9920
Pages
889-895
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2137623631
Cited by
607
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 6
FWCI
38.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
intellectual disability, premature mortality, avoidable mortality, contributing factors, advance care planning, Mental Capacity Act 2005, age at death, sex differences in mortality, primary care, South West England, causes of death, service delivery, health care delivery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, England, Humans, Life Expectancy, Medical Audit, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult, Mortality, Premature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review