Cited by 28Chronic Disease Management StrategiesClinical practice guidelines implementationPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Guideline recommended treatments in complex patients with multimorbidity

Muth, Christiane, Glasziou, Paul P·2015·BMJ

Abstract

New evidence is reassuring, but every patient is different

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.h5145

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muth, C., & Glasziou, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Muth, Christiane
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
351
Pages
h5145
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1843175701
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
multimorbidity, complex patients, guideline-directed therapy, personalized treatment, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review