Cited by 10Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPublishing and Scholarly Communication

China vows to clamp down on academic fraud amid medical journal scandal

Parry, Jane·2017·BMJ

Abstract

China’s Ministry of Science and Technology has said that it is investigating the case of 107 papers from China retracted by the journal Tumor Biology in April this year and that it has “zero tolerance” for academic fraud. The papers were retracted after the journal’s publisher, Springer, conducted a manual screening that showed that the authors had submitted papers with fake email addresses for reviewers. “The incident has had a very bad influence, seriously tarnishing the international reputation of China’s scientific …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.j2970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parry, J.
Corresponding author
Parry, Jane
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
357
Pages
j2970
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2654914596
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
academic fraud, research misconduct, retracted article, tumor biology, Springer, scientific integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review