Cited by 350Parasites and Host InteractionsParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and control

Efficacy of recommended drugs against soil transmitted helminths: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Open access
Moser, Wendelin, Schindler, Christian, Keiser, Jennifer·2017·BMJ

Abstract

Objective To evaluate efficacies of anthelmintic drugs against soil transmitted helminths in terms of cure rates and egg reduction rates. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and the World Health Organization library database from 1960 until 31 December 2016. Study selection Randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of a single dose regimen of albendazole, mebendazole, levamisole, and pyrantel pamoate against Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) and Trichuris trichiura. The primary outcomes included cure rates analysed by network meta-analysis with mixed logistic regression models and egg reduction rates with mixed linear models. Results 55 and 46 randomised controlled trials were included in the analysis of cure rates and egg reduction rates, respectively. All drugs were highly efficacious against A lumbricoides. Albendazole showed the highest efficacy against hookworm infections with a cure rate of 79.5% (95% confidence interval 71.5% to 85.6%) and an egg reduction rate of 89.6% (81.9% to 97.3%). All drugs had low efficacy against T trichiura, with mebendazole showing the highest cure rate of 42.1% (25.9% to 60.2%) and egg reduction rate of 66.0% (54.6% to 77.3%). Estimates for the years 1995 and 2015 showed significant reductions in efficacy of albendazole against T trichiura: by 2015 the egg reduction rates fell from 72.6% (53.7% to 91.5%) to 43.4% (23.5% to 63.3%; P=0.049) and the cure rates fell from 38.6% (26.2% to 52.7%) to 16.4 (7.7% to 31.3%; P=0.027). Conclusions All four currently recommended drugs show limitations in their efficacy profile. While only albendazole showed good efficacy against hookworm infection, all drugs had low efficacy against T trichiura. The decrease in efficacy of albendazole against T trichiura over the past two decades is of concern. The findings indicate the need for strengthening efforts to develop new drug treatments, with a particular focus on drugs against T trichiura.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.j4307

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ascaris lumbricoides is the most highly susceptible parasite species to albendazole and mebendazole among intestinal nematodes infecting humans.

    “Among various species of intestinal nematodes infecting humans, Ascaris lumbricoides is the most highly susceptible parasite species to albendazole and mebendazole [1,8–10,42–44] (Table 1).”

    From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Discussion (Summary of key findings) says albendazole and mebendazole are highly effective against A. lumbricoides, while reporting lower efficacy against hookworm or T. trichiura. The paper compares soil-transmitted helminths, however, not all intestinal nematodes infecting humans, so it does not establish the broader superlative. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The therapeutic efficacy of mebendazole against A. lumbricoides seems unchanged until recently (2017), reported 96.2% CR and 98.0% ERR.

    “The therapeutic efficacy of mebendazole against A. lumbricoides seems unchanged until recently (2017); it was reported to be 96.2% in CR and 98.0% in ERR [43].”

    From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    Table 1 and the Results section on A. lumbricoides report a 96.2% cure rate and 98.0% egg reduction rate for mebendazole. The copy does not establish that its efficacy remained unchanged through 2017; the Methods describe trend estimates for 1995 and 2015, not a 2017 measurement. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The therapeutic efficacy of albendazole against A. lumbricoides seems unchanged until recently (2017), reported 95.7-96.5% CR and 98.5-99.7% ERR.

    “The therapeutic efficacy of albendazole against A. lumbricoides seems unchanged until recently (2017); it was reported to be 95.7–96.5% in CR and 98.5–99.7% in ERR [42,43].”

    From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results section, “Drug efficacy against A lumbricoides” (page not provided), reports albendazole estimates of 95.7% for cure rate and 98.5% for egg reduction rate. It does not report the claimed upper endpoints of 96.5% and 99.7%, and the passages found do not establish that efficacy against A. lumbricoides remained unchanged through 2017. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Moser et al. considered the temporal decrease of albendazole efficacy against T. trichiura to be in part due to an emergence of drug resistance.

    “Moser et al. [42,43] put an emphasis on a temporal decrease of ERR which was 72.6% in 1995 and 43.4% in 2015 and considered this temporal decrease of albendazole efficacy against T. trichiura to be in part due to an emergence of drug resistance.”

    From Albendazole and Mebendazole as Anti-Parasitic and Anti-Cancer Agents: an Update (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results section reports that albendazole egg reduction rates against T. trichiura fell from 72.6% in 1995 to 43.4% in 2015. In Discussion > Clinical implications, the authors say the decline might be attributable to drug resistance, but they also say resistance in humans has not yet been shown and other factors might have contributed. The claim overstates their tentative explanation as a causal attribution. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mebendazole 500 mg single dose for T. trichiura showed lower efficacies recently: 27.9% CR and 66.0% ERR in 2012, 42.1% CR and 66.0% ERR in 2017, and 44.4% CR and 80.7% ERR in 2017.

    “Recently, however, the 500 mg single dose regimen showed lower efficacies, 27.9% CR and 66.0% ERR in 2012 [44] (Table 1), 42.1% CR and 66.0% ERR in 2017 [43], and 44.4% CR and 80.7% ERR in 2017 [42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. [1]Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors 2014; 7: 37 10.1186/1756-3305-7-37 pmid:24447578. 24447578 PMC3905661 · DOI
  2. [2]Blanton R. Handbook of Helminthiasis for Public Health. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 674- 5 10.3201/eid1304.070032. · DOI
  3. [3]Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet 2006; 367: 1521- 32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4 pmid:16679166. 16679166 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [10]Keiser J, Utzinger J. The drugs we have and the drugs we need against major helminth infections. Adv Parasitol 2010; 73: 197- 230. 10.1016/S0065-308X(10)73008-6 pmid:20627144. 20627144 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [11]Keiser J, Utzinger J. Efficacy of current drugs against soil-transmitted helminth infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2008; 299: 1937- 48. 10.1001/jama.299.16.1937. pmid:18430913. 18430913 · DOI
  6. [12]Speich B, Ame SM, Ali SM, et al. Oxantel pamoate-albendazole for Trichuris trichiura infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 610- 20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301956 pmid:24521107. 24521107 · DOI
  7. [13]Greco T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Saleh O, et al. The attractiveness of network meta-analysis: a comprehensive systematic and narrative review. Heart Lung Vessel 2015; 7: 133- 42. pmid:26157739. 26157739 PMC4476767
  8. [14]Greco T, Zangrillo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Landoni G. Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints. Heart Lung Vessel 2013; 5: 219- 25. pmid:24364016. 24364016 PMC3868184
  9. [16]Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 163- 71. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016 pmid:20688472. 20688472 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [17]Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health 2011; 14: 417- 28. 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002 pmid:21669366. 21669366 · DOI
  11. [19]Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 777- 84. 10.7326/M14-2385 pmid:26030634. 26030634 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [24]Kessels AGH, ter Riet G, Puhan MA, et alA simple regression model for network meta-analysis. OA Epidemiol 2013;Jul 22:7 10.13172/2053-079X-1-1-690. · DOI
  13. [25]Adegnika AA, Zinsou JF, Issifou S, et al. Randomized, controlled, assessor-blind clinical trial to assess the efficacy of single- versus repeated-dose albendazole to treat ascaris lumbricoides, trichuris trichiura, and hookworm infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 2535- 40. 10.1128/AAC.01317-13 pmid:24550339. 24550339 PMC3993258 · DOI
  14. [26]Speich B, Ali SM, Ame SM, et al. Efficacy and safety of albendazole plus ivermectin, albendazole plus mebendazole, albendazole plus oxantel pamoate, and mebendazole alone against Trichuris trichiura and concomitant soil-transmitted helminth infections: a four-arm, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 277- 84. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71050-3 pmid:25589326. 25589326 · DOI
  15. [27]Tankhiwale SR, Kukade AL, Sarmah HC, Salunkhe DS, Kulkarni AS. Single dose therapy of ascariasis--a randomized comparison of mebendazole and pyrantel. J Commun Dis 1989; 21: 71- 4. pmid:2681393. 2681393
  16. [28]Wang BR, Wang HC, Li LW, et al. Comparative efficacy of thienpydin, pyrantel pamoate, mebendazole and albendazole in treating ascariasis and enterobiasis. Chin Med J (Engl) 1987; 100: 928- 30. pmid:3130234. 3130234
  17. [29]Belizario VY, Amarillo ME, de Leon WU, de los Reyes AE, Bugayong MG, Macatangay BJ. A comparison of the efficacy of single doses of albendazole, ivermectin, and diethylcarbamazine alone or in combinations against Ascaris and Trichuris spp Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 35- 42. pmid:12640474. 12640474 PMC2572315
  18. [30]Ndyomugyenyi R, Kabatereine N, Olsen A, Magnussen P. Efficacy of ivermectin and albendazole alone and in combination for treatment of soil-transmitted helminths in pregnancy and adverse events: a randomized open label controlled intervention trial in Masindi district, western Uganda. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008; 79: 856- 63. pmid:19052293. 19052293
  19. [31]Albonico M, Mathema P, Montresor A, et al. Comparative study of the quality and efficacy of originator and generic albendazole for mass treatment of soil-transmitted nematode infections in Nepal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007; 101: 454- 60. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.09.003 pmid:17129592. 17129592 PMC5619640 · DOI
  20. [32]Zhang D, Zhang X, Tang Z, et al. [Field trials on the efficacy of albendazole composite against intestinal nematodiasis] Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 1998; 16: 1- 5. pmid:12078199. 12078199
  21. [33]Ioli A, Mento G, Leonaldi R, et al. Albendazole in the treatment of intestinal helminthiasis study on 140 patients. Riv Parassitol 1987; 4: 291- 6.
  22. [34]Farahmandian I, Arfaa F, Jalali H, Reza M. Comparative studies on the evaluation of the effect of new anthelminthics on various intestinal helminthiasis in Iran. Effects of anthelminthics on intestinal helminthiasis. Chemotherapy 1977; 23: 98- 105. 10.1159/000221977 pmid:318981. 318981 · DOI
  23. [35]Legesse M, Erko B, Medhin G. Efficacy of alebendazole and mebendazole in the treatment of Ascaris and Trichuris infections. Ethiop Med J 2002; 40: 335- 43. pmid:12596653. 12596653
  24. [36]Sinniah B, Sinniah D. The anthelmintic effects of pyrantel pamoate, oxantel-pyrantel pamoate, levamisole and mebendazole in the treatment of intestinal nematodes. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1981; 75: 315- 21. 10.1080/00034983.1981.11687445 pmid:7305501. 7305501 · DOI
  25. [37]Ortiz JJ, Lopez Chegne N, Gargala G, Favennec L. Comparative clinical studies of nitazoxanide, albendazole and praziquantel in the treatment of ascariasis, trichuriasis and hymenolepiasis in children from Peru. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2002; 96: 193- 6. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90301-9 pmid:12055813. 12055813 · DOI
  26. [38]Zani LC, Favre TC, Pieri OS, Barbosa CS. Impact of antihelminthic treatment on infection by Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworms in Covas, a rural community of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2004; 46: 63- 71. 10.1590/S0036-46652004000200002 pmid:15141272. 15141272 · DOI
  27. [39]Sarmah HC. A randomized controlled trial of pyrantel and mebendazole in children with enterobiasis and concomitant ascariasis. Indian Pediatr 1988; 25: 544- 7. pmid:3069744. 3069744
  28. [40]Nanivadekar AS, Gadgil SD, Apte VV. By National Anthelmintic Study Group. Efficacy of levamisole, mebendazole, piperazine and pyrantel in roundworm infection. J Postgrad Med 1984; 30: 144- 52. pmid:6384486. 6384486
  29. [41]Nontasut P, Singhasivanon V, Prarinyanuparp V, et al. Effect of single-dose albendazole and single-dose mebendazole on Necator americanus Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1989; 20: 237- 42. pmid:2692189. 2692189
  30. [42]Tefera E, Belay T, Mekonnen SK, Zeynudin A, Belachew T. Therapeutic efficacy of different brands of albendazole against soil transmitted helminths among students of Mendera Elementary School, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 22: 252 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.252.6501 pmid:26958115. 26958115 PMC4764304 · DOI
  31. [43]Zu LQ, Jiang ZX, Yu SH, et al. [Treatment of soil-transmitted helminth infections by anthelmintics in current use] Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 1992; 10: 95- 9. pmid:1394916. 1394916
  32. [44]Jongsuksuntigul P, Jeradit C, Pornpattanakul S, Charanasri U. A comparative study on the efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole in the treatment of ascariasis, hookworm infection and trichuriasis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1993; 24: 724- 9. pmid:7939948. 7939948
  33. [45]Lubis IN, Pasaribu S, Lubis CP. Current status of the efficacy and effectiveness of albendazole and mebendazole for the treatment of Ascaris lumbricoides in North-Western Indonesia. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2012; 5: 605- 9. 10.1016/S1995-7645(12)60125-4 pmid:22840447. 22840447 · DOI
  34. [47]Steinmann P, Utzinger J, Du Z-W, et al. Efficacy of single-dose and triple-dose albendazole and mebendazole against soil-transmitted helminths and Taenia spp: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2011; 6: e25003 10.1371/journal.pone.0025003 pmid:21980373. 21980373 PMC3181256 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [48]Sorensen E, Ismail M, Amarasinghe DK, Hettiarachchi I. The efficacy of three anthelmintic drugs given in a single dose. Ceylon Med J 1996; 41: 42- 5. pmid:8771941. 8771941
  36. [49]Albonico M, Bickle Q, Haji HJ, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of pyrantel-oxantel for the treatment of soil-transmitted nematode infections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2002; 96: 685- 90. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90352-4 pmid:12625151. 12625151 PMC5679355 · DOI
  37. [50]Kale OO. A comparative trial of the anthelminthic efficacy of pyrantel pamoate (Combantrin) and thiabendazole (Mintezol). Afr J Med Med Sci 1977; 6: 89- 93. pmid:416671. 416671
  38. [51]Chien FL, Foon K, Hassan K. Efficacy of albendazole against the three common soil-transmitted helminthiases. Trop Biomed 1989; 6: 133- 6.
  39. [52]El-Masry NA, Trabolsi B, Bassily S, Farid Z. Albendazole in the treatment of Ancylostoma duodenale and Ascaris lumbricoides infections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1983; 77: 160- 1. 10.1016/0035-9203(83)90056-1 pmid:6346589. 6346589 · DOI
  40. [53]Olds GR, King C, Hewlett J, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled study of concurrent administration of albendazole and praziquantel in schoolchildren with schistosomiasis and geohelminths. J Infect Dis 1999; 179: 996- 1003. 10.1086/314686 pmid:10068597. 10068597 · DOI
  41. [54]Oyediran ABOO, Oyejide CO. Double-blind comparative study of a new anthelminthic, albendazole, in the treatment of intestinal helminthes. London, England: Royal Soc Med (Soc Med Publ Group) 1983; 6: 89- 93.
  42. [55]Bwibo NO, Pamba HO. Double-blind comparative study of albendazole and placebo in the treatment of intestinal helminths. Roy Soc Med 1982; 57: 47- 53.
  43. [56]Knopp S, Mohammed KA, Speich B, et al. Albendazole and mebendazole administered alone or in combination with ivermectin against Trichuris trichiura: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 1420- 8. 10.1086/657310 pmid:21062129. 21062129 · DOI
  44. [57]Beach MJ, Streit TG, Addiss DG, Prospere R, Roberts JM, Lammie PJ. Assessment of combined ivermectin and albendazole for treatment of intestinal helminth and Wuchereria bancrofti infections in Haitian schoolchildren. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1999; 60: 479- 86. 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.479 pmid:10466981. 10466981 · DOI
  45. [59]Legesse M, Erko B, Medhin G. Comparative efficacy of albendazole and three brands of mebendazole in the treatment of ascariasis and trichuriasis. East Afr Med J 2004; 81: 134- 8. 10.4314/eamj.v81i3.9142 pmid:15293971. 15293971 · DOI
  46. [60]Bell WJ, Nassif S. Comparison of pyrantel pamoate and piperazine phosphate in the treatment of ascariasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1971; 20: 584- 8. 10.4269/ajtmh.1971.20.584 pmid:4936116. 4936116 · DOI
  47. [61]Hadju V, Stephenson LS, Abadi K, Mohammed HO, Bowman DD, Parker RS. Improvements in appetite and growth in helminth-infected schoolboys three and seven weeks after a single dose of pyrantel pamoate. Parasitology 1996; 113: 497- 504. 10.1017/S0031182000081579 pmid:8893536. 8893536 · DOI
  48. [62]Fox LM, Furness BW, Haser JK, et al. Tolerance and efficacy of combined diethylcarbamazine and albendazole for treatment of Wuchereria bancrofti and intestinal helminth infections in Haitian children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; 73: 115- 21. pmid:16014845. 16014845
  49. [63]Speich B, Ame SM, Ali SM, et al. Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide, albendazole, and nitazoxanide-albendazole against Trichuris trichiura infection: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012; 6: e1685 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001685 pmid:22679525. 22679525 PMC3367984 · DOI
  50. [64]Albonico M, Bickle Q, Ramsan M, Montresor A, Savioli L, Taylor M. Efficacy of mebendazole and levamisole alone or in combination against intestinal nematode infections after repeated targeted mebendazole treatment in Zanzibar. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81: 343- 52. pmid:12856052. 12856052 PMC2572452
  51. [65]Ekenjoku AJ, Oringanje C, Meremikwu MM. Comparative efficacy of levamisole, mebendalzole and pyrantel pamoate against common intestinal nematodes among children in Calabar, South-South Nigeria. Niger J Paediatr 2013; 40: 217- 21.
  52. [66]Sinniah B, Chew PI, Subramaniam K. A comparative trial of albendazole, mebendazole, pyrantel pamoate and oxantel pyrantel pamoate against soil-transmitted helminthiases in school children. Trop Biomed 1990; 7: 129- 34.
  53. [67]Albonico M, Smith PG, Ercole E, et al. Rate of reinfection with intestinal nematodes after treatment of children with mebendazole or albendazole in a highly endemic area. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995; 89: 538- 41. 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90101-9 pmid:8560535. 8560535 · DOI
  54. [68]Pugh RN, Teesdale CH, Burnham GM. Albendazole in children with hookworm infection. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1986; 80: 565- 7. 10.1080/00034983.1986.11812067 pmid:3307657. 3307657 · DOI
  55. [69]Morgan P, Yamamoto M, Teesdale C, et al. Albendazole: a new treatment for hookworm. Med Q J Med Assoc Malawi 1983; 1: 4- 5.
  56. [70]Flohr C, Tuyen LN, Lewis S, et al. Low efficacy of mebendazole against hookworm in Vietnam: two randomized controlled trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007; 76: 732- 6. pmid:17426180. 17426180
  57. [72]Sacko M, De Clercq D, Behnke JM, Gilbert FS, Dorny P, Vercruysse J. Comparison of the efficacy of mebendazole, albendazole and pyrantel in treatment of human hookworm infections in the southern region of Mali, West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999; 93: 195- 203. 10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90306-1 pmid:10450449. 10450449 · DOI
  58. [73]Adams VJ, Lombard CJ, Dhansay MA, Markus MB, Fincham JE. Efficacy of albendazole against the whipworm trichuris trichiura--a randomised, controlled trial. S Afr Med J 2004; 94: 972- 6. pmid:15662995. 15662995
  59. [74]Sirivichayakul C, Pojjaroen-anant C, Wisetsing P, et al. A comparative trial of albendazole alone versus combination of albendazole and praziquantel for treatment of Trichuris trichiura infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2001; 32: 297- 301. pmid:11556579. 11556579
  60. [75]Namwanje H, Kabatereine NB, Olsen A. Efficacy of single and double doses of albendazole and mebendazole alone and in combination in the treatment of Trichuris trichiura in school-age children in Uganda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2011; 105: 586- 90. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.07.009 pmid:21885077. 21885077 · DOI
  61. [76]Jackson TF, Epstein SR, Gouws E, Cheetham RF. A comparison of mebendazole and albendazole in treating children with Trichuris trichiura infection in Durban, South Africa. S Afr Med J 1998; 88: 880- 3. pmid:9698717. 9698717
  62. [77]WHO. Preventive chemotherapy for helminth diseases: progress report 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2016; 91: 89- 104. pmid:26922822. 26922823
  63. [78]Nikolay B, Brooker SJ, Pullan RL. Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for human soil-transmitted helminth infections: a meta-analysis in the absence of a true gold standard. Int J Parasitol 2014; 44: 765- 74. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.05.009 pmid:24992655. 24992655 PMC4186778 · DOI
  64. [79]Barda B, Zepherine H, Rinaldi L, et al. Mini-FLOTAC and Kato-Katz: helminth eggs watching on the shore of Lake Victoria. Parasit Vectors 2013; 6: 220 10.1186/1756-3305-6-220. pmid:23902918. 23902918 PMC3737047 · DOI
  65. [80]Montresor A. Cure rate is not a valid indicator for assessing drug efficacy and impact of preventive chemotherapy interventions against schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2011; 105: 361- 3. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.04.003 pmid:21612808. 21612808 PMC5576534 · DOI
  66. [81]Levecke B, Mekonnen Z, Albonico M, Vercruysse J. The impact of baseline faecal egg counts on the efficacy of single-dose albendazole against Trichuris trichiura Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2012; 106: 128- 30. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.09.007 pmid:22189084. 22189084 · DOI
  67. [82]Kale OO, Bammeke AO, Nwankwo EO. Field trials of pyrantel pamoate (Combantrin) in Ascaris, hookworm and Trichuris infections. Afr J Med Med Sci 1982; 11: 23- 31. pmid:6291355. 6291355
  68. [83]Loukas A, Hotez PJ, Diemert D, et al. Hookworm infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2: 16088 10.1038/nrdp.2016.88 pmid:27929101. 27929101 · DOI
  69. [85]Coles GC. Drug resistance and drug tolerance in parasites. Trends Parasitol 2006; 22: 348- 9, author reply 349. 10.1016/j.pt.2006.05.013 pmid:16765645. 16765645 · DOI
  70. [86]Reynoldson JA, Behnke JM, Pallant LJ, et al. Failure of pyrantel in treatment of human hookworm infections (Ancylostoma duodenale) in the Kimberley region of north west Australia. Acta Trop 1997; 68: 301- 12. 10.1016/S0001-706X(97)00106-X pmid:9492915. 9492915 · DOI
  71. [87]de Lourdes Mottier M, Prichard RK. Genetic analysis of a relationship between macrocyclic lactone and benzimidazole anthelmintic selection on Haemonchus contortus Pharmacogenet Genomics 2008; 18: 129- 40. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f4711d pmid:18192899. 18192899 · DOI
  72. [88]Silvestre A, Cabaret J. Mutation in position 167 of isotype 1 beta-tubulin gene of Trichostrongylid nematodes: role in benzimidazole resistance? Mol Biochem Parasitol 2002; 120: 297- 300. 10.1016/S0166-6851(01)00455-8 pmid:11897135. 11897135 · DOI
  73. [89]Czobor P, Skolnick P. The secrets of a successful clinical trial: compliance, compliance, and compliance. Mol Interv 2011; 11: 107- 10. 10.1124/mi.11.2.8 pmid:21540470. 21540470 PMC3109858 · DOI
  74. [90]Moser W, Ali SM, Ame SM, et al. Efficacy and safety of oxantel pamoate in school-aged children infected with Trichuris trichiura on Pemba Island, Tanzania: a parallel, randomised, controlled, dose-ranging study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16: 53- 60. 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00271-6 pmid:26388169. 26388169 · DOI
  75. [91]WHO. Water sanitation & hygiene for accelerating and sustaining progress on neglected tropical diseases: a global strategy 2015-2020.Geneva World Health Organzation, 2015. PMC5580794 26940305
  76. [92]Gyorkos TW, Maheu-Giroux M, Blouin B, Casapia M. Impact of health education on soil-transmitted helminth infections in schoolchildren of the Peruvian Amazon: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2397 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002397 pmid:24069469. 24069469 PMC3772033 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moser, W., Schindler, C., & Keiser, J.
Affiliations
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH)
Corresponding author
Keiser, Jennifer
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-09-25
Volume
358
Pages
j4307
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2759758131
Cited by
350
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (320030_14930/1, 320030_14930, No 320030_14930, 320030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
soil-transmitted helminths, anthelmintic efficacy, albendazole, mebendazole, levamisole, pyrantel pamoate, Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, cure rate, egg reduction rate, anthelmintic resistance, single-dose therapy, deworming programs
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Animals, Anthelmintics, Female, Helminthiasis, Helminths, Humans, Male, Soil, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review