Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
Abstract
Progress has been made towards reducing the 85% of wasted effort in medical research—and the huge amounts of money misspent and harm caused to patients—but there’s still a long way to go, say Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a high risk of research waste (Glasziou 2018).
“since there is a high risk of research waste (Glasziou 2018).”
From Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults (2020) · cites this paper as Glasziou 2018
Cites
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127 · see citing works
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/483531a · Cited by 2,979 · see citing works
Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A., Haahr, M. T., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Altman, D. G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 · Cited by 1,845 · see citing works
Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy
Donnelly, C. A., Boyd, I., Campbell, P., Craig, C., Vallance, P., Walport, M., Whitty, C. J. M., Woods, E., & Wormald, C. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05414-4 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Evidence based medicine manifesto for better healthcare
Heneghan, C., Mahtani, K. R., Goldacre, B., Godlee, F., Macdonald, H., & Jarvies, D. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j2973 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pollock, D., Davies, E. L., Peters, M. D. J., Tricco, A. C., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., & Munn, Z. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14743 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
“Cottrell et al. (2015) identified the following reasons stakeholders should be included when conducting evidence synthesis: • To inform researchers about topics that are needed and relevant to the identified community, thus reducing research waste (Glasziou & Chalmers, 2018).”
BackgroundPsychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Williams, A. C. D. C., Fisher, E., Hearn, L., & Eccleston, C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007407.pub4 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research
Jung, R. G., Di Santo, P., Clifford, C., Prosperi-Porta, G., Skanes, S., Hung, A., Parlow, S., Visintini, S., Ramirez, F. D., Simard, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21220-5 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Tembo, D., Hickey, G., Montenegro, C., Chandler, D., Nelson, E., Porter, K., Dikomitis, L., Chambers, M., Chimbari, M., Mumba, N., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n178 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
Van Calster, B., Wynants, L., Riley, R. D., van Smeden, M., & Collins, G. S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
A New Normal: Integrating Lived Experience Into Scientific Data Syntheses
Beames, J. R., Kikas, K., O'Gradey-Lee, M., Gale, N., Werner-Seidler, A., Boydell, K. M., & Hudson, J. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.763005 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Evidence synthesis for tackling research waste
Grainger, M. J., Bolam, F. C., Stewart, G. B., & Nilsen, E. B. (2020) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1141-6 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Bullock, G. S., Ward, P., Impellizzeri, F. M., Kluzek, S., Hughes, T., Hillman, C., Waterman, B. R., Danelson, K., Henry, K., Barr, E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12016 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I.
- Affiliations
- Bond University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Glasziou, Paul
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-11-12
- Pages
- k4645
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- OpenAlex
- W2901453117
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 31
- FWCI
- 36.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- research waste, medical research, research productivity, research funding, research efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review