Data sharing in medical research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consensus is building that data sharing is an inseparable part of the research process.
“Consensus is building that data sharing is “an inseparable part of the research process.”127”
From Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology using Mendelian Randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration. (2021) · cites this paper as [127]
Cites
Naudet, F., Sakarovitch, C., Janiaud, P., Cristea, I., Fanelli, D., Moher, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k400 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Why data sharing should be the expected norm
Krumholz, H. M. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h599 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Taichman, D. B., Backus, J., Baethge, C., Bauchner, H., de Leeuw, P. W., Drazen, J. M., Fletcher, J., Frizelle, F., Groves, T., Haileamlak, A., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i255 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Data sharing: lessons from Copernicus and Kepler
Packer, M. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4911 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Skrivankova, V. W., Richmond, R. C., Woolf, B. A. R., Davies, N. M., Swanson, S. A., VanderWeele, T. J., Timpson, N. J., Higgins, J. P. T., Dimou, N., Langenberg, C., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2233 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
McGuinness, L. A., & Sheppard, A. L. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250887 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Packer, M.
- Affiliations
- Baylor University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Packer, Milton
- ORCID
- Packer, Milton
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-02-14
- Volume
- 360
- Pages
- k510
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- OpenAlex
- W2794197094
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- data sharing, medical research, research data, research transparency
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Information Dissemination, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
