Cited by 6Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMedicine, History, and PhilosophyInnovations in Medical Education

Advancing diagnostic excellence: the cognitive challenge for medicine

Croskerry, Pat, Clancy, Mike·2022·BMJ

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.o799

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Croskerry, P., & Clancy, M.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-03-29
Volume
376
Pages
o799
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220956924
Cited by
6
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
diagnosis, diagnostic reasoning, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review