Cited by 17Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes and associated disorders

Lifetime risk and years lost to type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Denmark, 1996–2016

Open access
Carstensen, Bendix, Rønn, Pernille Falberg, Jørgensen, Marit Eika·2021·BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

Abstract

Introduction: Lifetime risk and lifetime lost to diabetes are measures of current diabetes burden in a population. We aimed at quantifying these measures in the Danish population. Research design and methods: We modeled incidence and mortality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and non-diabetes mortality based on complete follow-up of the entire population of Denmark in 1996–2016. A multistate model with these transition rates was used to assess the lifetime risk of diabetes, as well as the difference in expected lifetime between persons with type 1 and T2D and persons without. Results: In 2016, the lifetime risk of T1D was 1.1% and that for T2D 24%, the latter a 50% increase from 1996. For 50-year-old persons, the lifetime lost was 6.6 years for T1D and 4.8 years for T2D. These figures have been declining over the study period. At 2016, the total foreseeable lives lost in Denmark among patients with T1D were 182 000 years, and those among patients with T2D were 766 000 years, corresponding to 6.6 and 3.0 years per person, respectively. Conclusion: At the individual level, improvements in the disease burden for both T1D and T2D have occurred. At the population level, the increasing number of patients with T2D has contributed to a large increase in the total loss of lifetime.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001065

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Denmark, expected years of life lost to type 1 diabetes mellitus from age 60 years were 6.9 for men and 6.0 for women in 2017.

    “In Denmark, the expected years of life lost to T1DM from age 60 years were 6.9 for men and 6.0 for women in 2017 (ref. 45).”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    Table 1 (Results, “Lifetime risk of diabetes”; page not provided) gives 6.0 years lost to T1D for women aged 60 on January 1, 2017, as claimed. For men aged 60, it gives 5.2 years, not 6.9; the 6.9 figure is for women aged 50. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [2]Gregg EW, Zhuo X, Cheng YJ, et al. Trends in lifetime risk and years of life lost due to diabetes in the USA, 1985-2011: a modelling study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 867– 74. 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70161-5 25128274 · DOI
  2. [4]Leung M-YM, Pollack LM, Colditz GA, et al. Life years lost and lifetime health care expenditures associated with diabetes in the U.S., National health interview survey, 1997-2000. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 460– 8. 10.2337/dc14-1453 25552420 PMC4338508 · DOI
  3. [5]Wright AK, Kontopantelis E, Emsley R, et al. Life expectancy and cause-specific mortality in type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study quantifying relationships in ethnic subgroups. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 338– 45. 10.2337/dc16-1616 27998911 · DOI
  4. [6]Carstensen B, Kristensen JK, Ottosen P, et al. The Danish national diabetes register: trends in incidence, prevalence and mortality. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 2187– 96. 10.1007/s00125-008-1156-z 18815769 · DOI
  5. [7]Carstensen B, Jørgensen ME, Friis S. The epidemiology of diabetes and cancer. Curr Diab Rep 2014; 14: 535. 10.1007/s11892-014-0535-8 25156543 · DOI
  6. [8]Andersen PK. Decomposition of number of life years lost according to causes of death. Stat Med 2013; 32: 5278– 85. 10.1002/sim.5903 23839860 · DOI
  7. [9]Carstensen B, Rønn PF, Jørgensen ME. Prevalence, incidence and mortality of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in Denmark 1996-2016. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8: e001071. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001071 PMC7265004 32475839 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Carstensen B, Rønn PF, Jørgensen ME. Components of diabetes prevalence in Denmark 1996-2016 and future trends until 2030. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8: e001064. 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001064 PMC7418686 32784246 · DOI
  9. [11]Carstensen B. Age-Period-Cohort models for the Lexis diagram. Stat Med 2007; 26: 3018– 45. 10.1002/sim.2764 17177166 · DOI
  10. [13]Loukine L, Waters C, Choi BC, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on life expectancy and health-adjusted life expectancy in Canada. Popul Health Metr 2012; 10: 7. 10.1186/1478-7954-10-7 22531113 PMC3787852 · DOI
  11. [14]Morgan CL, Currie CJ, Peters JR. Relationship between diabetes and mortality: a population study using record linkage. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1103– 7. 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1103 10937505 · DOI
  12. [15]Wang Z, Liu M. Life years lost associated with diabetes: an individually matched cohort study using the U.S. National health interview survey data. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016; 118: 69– 76. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.015 27348179 · DOI
  13. [16]Norhammar A, Bodegård J, Nyström T, et al. Incidence, prevalence and mortality of type 2 diabetes requiring glucose-lowering treatment, and associated risks of cardiovascular complications: a nationwide study in Sweden, 2006-2013. Diabetologia 2016; 59: 1692– 701. 10.1007/s00125-016-3971-y 27189067 · DOI
  14. [17]Huo L, Harding JL, Peeters A, et al. Life expectancy of type 1 diabetic patients during 1997-2010: a national Australian registry-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2016; 59: 1177– 85. 10.1007/s00125-015-3857-4 26796634 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carstensen, B., Rønn, P. F., & Jørgensen, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Jørgensen, Marit Eika
Venue
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-03
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e001065
ISSN
2052-4897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133875180
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, lifetime risk, diabetes burden, diabetes incidence, diabetes mortality, multi-state models, population trends, Denmark
MeSH terms
Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Middle Aged, Incidence, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review