Cited by 281Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries

Open access
Benova, Lenka, Tunçalp, Özge, Moran, Allisyn C, Campbell, Oona Maeve Renee·2018·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal care (ANC) provides a critical opportunity for women and babies to benefit from good-quality maternal care. Using 10 countries as an illustrative analysis, we described ANC coverage (number of visits and timing of first visit) and operationalised indicators for content of care as available in population surveys, and examined how these two approaches are related. Methods: We used the most recent Demographic and Health Survey to analyse ANC related to women’s most recent live birth up to 3 years preceding the survey. Content of care was assessed using six components routinely measured across all countries, and a further one to eight additional country-specific components. We estimated the percentage of women in need of ANC, and using ANC, who received each component, the six routine components and all components. Results: In all 10 countries, the majority of women in need of ANC reported 1+ ANC visits and over two-fifths reported 4+ visits. Receipt of the six routine components varied widely; blood pressure measurement was the most commonly reported component, and urine test and information on complications the least. Among the subset of women starting ANC in the first trimester and receiving 4+ visits, the percentage receiving all six routinely measured ANC components was low, ranging from 10% (Jordan) to around 50% in Nigeria, Nepal, Colombia and Haiti. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that even among women with patterns of care that complied with global recommendations, the content of care was poor. Efficient and effective action to improve care quality relies on development of suitable content of care indicators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000779

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of available ANC has been shown to predict its utilization.

    “Additionally, the quality of available ANC has been shown to predict its utilization [6, 22].”

    From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion suggests that experiencing poor-quality ANC at an early visit might lead some women to curtail later visits. It does not demonstrate that the quality of available ANC predicts utilization; the proposed explanation is explicitly tentative and concerns continued visits after an initial visit. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The current study observed high ANC attendance rates among Rohingya when compared to Bangladesh more generally and other South Asian countries where most women receive no more than three ANC visits.

    “This is similar to the current study, which observed high ANC attendance rates among Rohingya when compared to Bangladesh more generally and other South Asian countries where most women receive no more than three ANC visits [14, 22, 46, 54].”

    From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results (page not available) report ANC visits in Nepal, including a median of four visits among women who received ANC, but do not establish that most women there had no more than three visits. The paper does not report Bangladesh or Rohingya attendance, so its copy cannot verify the comparison attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kuhnt, 2017, Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 low-income and middle-income countries, BMJ Open, 7, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017122 · DOI
  4. Moran, 2016, A common monitoring framework for ending preventable maternal mortality, 2015-2030: phase I of a multi-step process, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16, 250, 10.1186/s12884-016-1035-4 · DOI
  5. Hodgins S , D’Agostino A . The quality–coverage gap in antenatal care: toward better measurement of effective coverage. Science and Practice: Global Health, 2014. · DOI
  6. Ng, 2014, Effective coverage: a metric for monitoring Universal Health Coverage, PLoS Med, 11, e1001730, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001730 · DOI
  7. Saad-Haddad, 2016, Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries, J Glob Health, 6, 010404, 10.7189/jogh.06.010404 · DOI
  8. Liu, 2013, Measuring coverage in MNCH: a validation study linking population survey derived coverage to maternal, newborn, and child health care records in rural China, PLoS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0060762 · DOI
  9. Downe S , Finlayson K , Tunçalp Özge , et al . Factors that influence the uptake of routine antenatal services by pregnant women: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;24.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012392 · DOI
  10. Downe S , Finlayson K , Tuncalp O , et al . Factors that influence the provision of good-quality routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis of the views and experiences of maternity care providers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017;8. · DOI
  11. Campbell, 2016, Family planning, antenatal and delivery care: cross-sectional survey evidence on levels of coverage and inequalities by public and private sector in 57 low- and middle-income countries, Trop Med Int Health, 21, 486, 10.1111/tmi.12681 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/tmi.12414 · DOI
  13. Kanyangarara, 2017, Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments, J Glob Health, 7, 021101, 10.7189/jogh.07.021101 · DOI
  14. Chukwuma, 2017, Quality of antenatal care predicts retention in skilled birth attendance: a multilevel analysis of 28 African countries, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17, 152, 10.1186/s12884-017-1337-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.047 · DOI
  16. Benova, 2017, Should I stay or should I go?: consistency and switching of delivery locations among new mothers in 39 Sub-Saharan African and South/Southeast Asian countries, Health Policy Plan, 32, 1294, 10.1093/heapol/czx087 · DOI
  17. Downe, 2016, What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women, BJOG, 123, 529, 10.1111/1471-0528.13819 · DOI
  18. Mazzoni, 2017, Group prenatal care, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 216, 552, 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006 · DOI
  19. Khan, 2015, Maternal and neonatal tetanus elimination: from protecting women and newborns to protecting all, Int J Womens Health, 7, 171
  20. Hassan, 2016, Tetanus vaccination status and its associated factors among women attending a primary healthcare center in Cairo governorate, Egypt, J Egypt Public Health Assoc, 91, 127, 10.1097/01.EPX.0000491267.30015.2a · DOI
  21. 10.1186/1471-2393-12-151 · DOI
  22. Marchant, 2015, Adding content to contacts: measurement of high quality contacts for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia, north east Nigeria, and Uttar Pradesh, India, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0126840 · DOI
  23. Heredia-Pi, 2016, Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: a national cross-sectional study in Mexico, Bull World Health Organ, 94, 452, 10.2471/BLT.15.168302 · DOI
  24. Yeoh, 2015, Assessing the extent of adherence to the recommended antenatal care content in Malaysia: room for improvement, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0135301 · DOI
  25. Boller, 2003, Quality and comparison of antenatal care in public and private providers in the United Republic of Tanzania, Bull World Health Organ, 81, 116
  26. Owolabi, 2017, Comparing the use and content of antenatal care in adolescent and older first-time mothers in 13 countries of west Africa: a cross-sectional analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys, Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 1, 203, 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30025-1 · DOI
  27. Bashour, 2005, Syrian women’s perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy, Reprod Health Matters, 13, 147, 10.1016/S0968-8080(05)25164-9 · DOI
  28. 10.1186/s12913-014-0652-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Moller, 2017, Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013, Lancet Glob Health, 5, e977, 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30325-X · DOI
  30. Hodgins, 2016, A new look at care in pregnancy: simple, effective interventions for neglected populations, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0160562 · DOI
  31. Amoakoh-Coleman, 2016, Provider adherence to first antenatal care guidelines and risk of pregnancy complications in public sector facilities: a Ghanaian cohort study, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 16, 369, 10.1186/s12884-016-1167-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/1471-0528.14599 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.1258926 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Benova, L., Tunçalp, Ö., Moran, A. C., & Campbell, O. M. R.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
e000779
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2798063791
Cited by
281
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 4
FWCI
29.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
MSD for Mothers
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
prenatal care, antenatal care coverage, low- and middle-income countries, maternal health, first-trimester antenatal care, maternity care quality, Demographic and Health Surveys, blood pressure measurement, urine analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review