Cited by 10Global Maternal and Child HealthPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-economic and geographic equity in maternal health services utilization in Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Addressing disparities in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health services is crucial in achieving the Sustainable Development Goal of universal health coverage. The persistence of social and geographic disparities in maternal health service coverage and utilization poses significant challenges. Ensuring equity in health service access and utilization as part of universal health coverage requires evidence whether these inequities exist. This study aimed to measure socio-economic and geographic equity in coverage and effective coverage of both antenatal care and skilled birth attendance. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from the Performance Monitoring for Action Ethiopia from 2019 to 2020, including 2714 postpartum women at around six weeks and service delivery point assessment data from 462 health facilities. We measured inequities in the utilization of four or more antenatal care visits and skilled birth attendance using equiplots and concentration index. Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi statistics and Kriging interpolations were employed to analyze geographic variations of maternal health service utilization. RESULTS: In this study, 40% (95%CI: 36, 45) utilized four or more ANC visits, and 12% (95%CI: 11, 14) received quality antenatal care. Over half (54%, 95%CI: 48, 59) of women utilized skilled birth attendance, but only 7% (95%CI: 4, 8) received quality delivery care. The absolute equity gap between the least poor and the poorest women was 43 percentage points for ANC visits and 65 percentage points for skilled birth attendance. A higher proportion of women in Central and Northern parts of Ethiopia had four or more ANC visits and utilized skilled birth attendance, while most parts of the Eastern part of the country and most areas in the South had low levels of utilization. CONCLUSION: The coverage of four or more antenatal care visits and skilled birth attendance was low and inequitable, with the poorest women receiving fewer services. The coverage varied across different parts of the country. Interventions that target groups of women and geographic areas with low coverage of services are crucial for reaching the goal of universal health coverage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-025-12639-3

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reproductive-age women in urban areas reported the least financial barriers to access healthcare compared to their counterparts in rural areas.

    “Additionally, reproductive-age women in urban areas reported the least financial barriers to access healthcare compared to their counterpart in rural areas”

    From Financial barriers to healthcare access among reproductive-age women in Sierra Leone: evidence from demographic health surveys of 2008, 2013, and 2019 (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Discussion suggests that transportation costs may hinder maternal-service use, particularly for impoverished women in rural areas. It does not report that urban women had the fewest financial barriers, or measure a financial-barrier comparison between urban and rural women. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ephi ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key IndicatorsEphi ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key Indicators. Mid Atlantic Region: EPHI and ICF; 2019.
  2. Abraha A, Mylus A, Byass P, Kahsay A, Kinsman J. Three-tier Ethiopian health care system (Source: Ethiopian health sector development plan 2010–2015). PLOS One. 2019;14(6):e0218101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218101.g001. · DOI
  3. Mitchell A. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2. ESRI Press; 2005.
  4. Lawson AB. Statistical methods in spatial epidemiology. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  5. Joseph Kwame Wulifan ADDaJS. Nomadic pastoralists’ experience accessing reproductive and maternal healthcare services in low and middle-income countries: A contextual scoping review Pastoralism. 2022;12:47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Denu, Z., Defar, A., Persson, L., Lemma, S., Berhanu, D., Getachew, T., Shiferaw, S., Tariku, A., Guadu, T., Zelalem, M., Taye, G., Schellenberg, J., Marchant, T., & Alemu, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Gondar (ET)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Ethiopian Public Health Institute (ET)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Federal Ministry of Health (ET)
Corresponding author
Denu, Zewditu
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-26
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
610-610
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409828128
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
maternal health service utilization, prenatal care, skilled birth attendance, health equity, socioeconomic disparities, geographic disparities, effective coverage, universal health coverage, postpartum women, Ethiopia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethiopia, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Socioeconomic Factors, Healthcare Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review