The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Brazilian health system at crossroads: progress, crisis and resilience
Open accessAbstract
The Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)) has enabled substantial progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in Brazil. However, structural weakness, economic and political crises and austerity policies that have capped public expenditure growth are threatening its sustainability and outcomes. This paper analyses the Brazilian health system progress since 2000 and the current and potential effects of the coalescing economic and political crises and the subsequent austerity policies. We use literature review, policy analysis and secondary data from governmental sources in 2000–2017 to examine changes in political and economic context, health financing, health resources and healthcare service coverage in SUS. We find that, despite a favourable context, which enabled expansion of UHC from 2003 to 2014, structural problems persist in SUS, including gaps in organisation and governance, low public funding and suboptimal resource allocation. Consequently, large regional disparities exist in access to healthcare services and health outcomes, with poorer regions and lower socioeconomic population groups disadvantaged the most. These structural problems and disparities will likely worsen with the austerity measures introduced by the current government, and risk reversing the achievements of SUS in improving population health outcomes. The speed at which adverse effects of the current and political crises are manifested in the Brazilian health system underscores the importance of enhancing health system resilience to counteract external shocks (such as economic and political crises) and internal shocks (such as sector-specific austerity policies and rapid ageing leading to rise in disease burden) to protect hard-achieved progress towards UHC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ranzani, O. T., Bastos, L. S. L., Gelli, J. G. M., Marchesi, J. F., Baião, F., Hamacher, S., & Bozza, F. A. (2021) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30560-9 · Cited by 513
Ortega, F., & Orsini, M. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223 · Cited by 325
Gomez Rossi, J., Rojas-Perilla, N., Krois, J., & Schwendicke, F. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0269 · Cited by 141
Lotta, G., Nunes, J., Fernandez, M., & Garcia Correa, M. (2022) · Health Policy OPEN · doi:10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100065 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Massuda, A., Hone, T., Leles, F. A. G., de Castro, M. C., & Atun, R.
- Venue
- BMJ Global Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e000829
- ISSN
- 2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810366649
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 77.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Brazilian health system at crossroads: progress, crisis and resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000829
- The paper
- Massuda, A., Hone, T., Leles, F. A. G., de Castro, M. C., & Atun, R. (2018). The Brazilian health system at crossroads: progress, crisis and resilience. BMJ Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000829
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.