Cited by 62Global Health and SurgeryGlobal Health Workforce IssuesAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy

What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?

Open access
Davies, Justine I, Vreede, Eric, Onajin-Obembe, Bisola, Morriss, Wayne W·2018·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The number of specialist anaesthetists in most low-income and middle-income countries is below what is needed to provide a safe quality anaesthesia service. There are no estimates of the optimal number; therefore, we estimated the minimum density of specialist anaesthetists to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare as indicated by the maternal mortality ratio (MMR). METHODS: Utilising existing country-level data of the number of physician anaesthesia providers (PAPs), MMR and Human Development Index (HDI), we developed best-fit curves to describe the relationship between MMR and PAPs, controlling for HDI. The aim was to use this relationship to estimate the number of PAPs associated with achieving the median MMR. RESULTS: We estimated that, in order to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare, as indicated by the global median MMR, countries should aim to have at least four PAPs per 100 000 population. Existing data show that currently 80 countries have fewer than this number. CONCLUSION: Four PAPs per 100 000 population is a modest target, but there is a need to increase training of doctors in many countries in order to train more specialist anaesthetists. It is important that this target is considered during the development of national workforce plans, even if a stepwise approach to workforce planning is chosen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001005

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper's findings support the view that HDI is a health workforce predictor.

    “our findings support the view that it is a health workforce predictor [23].”

    From Oral health workforce in Africa: a scarce resource (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Previous studies have shown evidence that similar variables are predictors for NCD incidence and for health workforce.

    “Previous studies have shown evidence that similar variables are predictors for NCD incidence [20,21,22] and for health workforce [23].”

    From Oral health workforce in Africa: a scarce resource (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Gore-Booth J, Mellin-Olsen J, Morriss W WFSA describes its vision for implementation of WHA 68.15. The Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 2018; 103: 44– 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, J. I., Vreede, E., Onajin-Obembe, B., & Morriss, W. W.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Sierra Leone (SL)
  • Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
  • Christchurch Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Davies, Justine I
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-01
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
e001005
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903169944
Cited by
62
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Keywords
anesthesiology workforce, maternal mortality ratio, workforce planning, low- and middle-income countries, Human Development Index, anesthesiology education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review