Cited by 23Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyHealth Policy Implementation Science

Improving the implementation of tobacco control policies in low-and middle-income countries: a proposed framework

Open access
Hoe, Connie, Kennedy, Ryan D, Spires, Mark, Tamplin, Stephen, Cohen, Joanna E·2019·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

► Although tobacco control policies have been adopted across the globe, effective implementation continues to be a major challenge, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, where almost 80% of the world's smokers reside.► This conceptual framework illustrates the constellation of factors that have been shown to influence implementation fidelity: political commitment, institutional capacity and operational effectiveness, social climate and tobacco industry interference.► Researchers and practitioners can use this framework to identify the points of leverage in the implementation process and contribute to actionable knowledge as well as theory development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002078

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low awareness of the full society-wide harms of tobacco reinforces barriers to implementation, particularly in LMICs facing or at risk of high burdens.

    “Reinforcing these barriers is low awareness of the full, society-wide harms of tobacco, particularly in LMICs facing or at risk of high burdens.19”

    From Advancing progress on tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries through economic analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The framework’s social-climate discussion (page not available in our copy) links public awareness and education to effective tobacco-control implementation, and its introduction identifies LMICs as facing particular implementation challenges. It does not say that awareness of tobacco’s full society-wide harms is low or identify that specific lack of awareness as a barrier. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [2]Cairney P, Mamudu H The global tobacco control ‘endgame’: change the policy environment to implement the FCTC. J Public Health Policy 2014; 35: 506– 17. 10.1057/jphp.2014.18 24831675 · DOI
  2. [3]Crosbie E, Sosa P, Glantz SA Costa Rica’s implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: overcoming decades of industry dominance. Salud Pública Mex 2016; 58: 62– 70. 10.21149/spm.v58i1.7669 26879509 PMC4758506 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Lee S, Ling PM, Glantz SA The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries. Cancer Causes Control 2012; 23: 117– 29. 10.1007/s10552-012-9914-0 22370696 PMC3332051 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [11]Van Meter D, Van Horn CE The policy implementation process: a conceptual framework. Administration and Society 1975; 6: 445– 88.
  5. [13]Sabatier P, Weible C The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. 2nd Ed PA Sabatier. Boulder: Westview Press, 2007: 189– 220.
  6. [15]Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, et al Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2012; 43: 337– 50. 22898128 PMC3592983
  7. [16]Munzer A The WHO FCTC: the challenge of implementation. Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2013; 1: 182– 4. 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70048-1 24429115 · DOI
  8. [17]Leischow SJ, Ayo-Yusuf O, Backinger CL Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15: 761– 6. 10.1093/ntr/nts199 22990225 PMC3693497 · DOI
  9. [20]Bump JB, Reich MR Political economy analysis for tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2013; 28: 123– 33. 10.1093/heapol/czs049 22585874 · DOI
  10. [22]Hoe C, Rodriguez DC, Üzümcüoğlu Y, et al “Quitting like a Turk:” How political priority developed for tobacco control in Turkey. Soc Sci Med 2016; 165: 36– 45. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.027 27490408 · DOI
  11. [23]Roussos ST, Fawcett SB A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 369– 402. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369 10884958 · DOI
  12. [24]Lencucha R, Drope J, Labonte R, et al Investment incentives and the implementation of the framework convention on tobacco control: evidence from Zambia. Tob Control 2016; 25: 483– 7. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052250 26135987 PMC4887414 · DOI
  13. [25]Keck M, Sikkink K, Borders AB Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press, 1998.
  14. [26]Uang R, Crosbie E, Glantz SA Tobacco control law implementation in a middle-income country: transnational tobacco control network overcoming tobacco industry opposition in Colombia. Glob Public Health 2018; 13: 1050– 64. 10.1080/17441692.2017.1357188 28816610 PMC5816722 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [27]Sankaran S, Hiilamo H, Glantz SA Implementation of graphic health warning labels on tobacco products in India: the interplay between the cigarette and the bidi industries. Tob Control 2015; 24: 547– 55. 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051536 24950697 PMC4272673 · DOI
  16. [29]Shiffman J Generating political priority for maternal mortality reduction in 5 developing countries. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 796– 803. 10.2105/AJPH.2006.095455 17395848 PMC1854881 · DOI
  17. [30]Kaufman MR, Merritt AP, Rimbatmaja R, et al 'Excuse me, sir. Please don't smoke here'. A qualitative study of social enforcement of smoke-free policies in Indonesia. Health Policy Plan 2015; 30: 995– 1002. 10.1093/heapol/czu103 25244917 PMC4559114 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoe, C., Kennedy, R. D., Spires, M., Tamplin, S., & Cohen, J. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoe, Connie
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
e002078
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996740554
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bloomberg Family Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
tobacco control, policy implementation, implementation fidelity, low- and middle-income countries, political commitment, institutional capacity, operational effectiveness, social climate, tobacco industry interference, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review