Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social inequality and infant health in the UK: systematic review and meta-analyses

Weightman, Alison L, Morgan, Helen E, Shepherd, Michael A, Kitcher, Hilary, Roberts, Chris, Dunstan, Frank D·2012·BMJ Open
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000964
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between area and individual measures of social disadvantage and infant health in the UK. Design: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data sources: 26 databases and websites, reference lists, experts in the field and hand-searching. Study selection: 36 prospective and retrospective observational studies with socioeconomic data and health outcomes for infants in the UK, published from 1994 to May 2011. Data extraction and synthesis: 2 independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the studies and abstracted data. Where possible, study outcomes were reported as ORs for the highest versus the lowest deprivation quintile. Results: In relation to the highest versus lowest area deprivation quintiles, the odds of adverse birth outcomes were 1.81 (95% CI 1.71 to 1.92) for low birth weight, 1.67 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.96) for premature birth and 1.54 (95% CI 1.39 to 1.72) for stillbirth. For infant mortality rates, the ORs were 1.72 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.15) overall, 1.61 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.39) for neonatal and 2.31 (95% CI 2.03 to 2.64) for post-neonatal mortality. For lowest versus highest social class, the odds were 1.79 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.24) for low birth weight, 1.52 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.61) for overall infant mortality, 1.42 (95% CI 1.33 to1.51) for neonatal and 1.69 (95% CI 1.53 to 1.87) for post-neonatal mortality. There are similar patterns for other infant health outcomes with the possible exception of failure to thrive, where there is no clear association. Conclusions: This review quantifies the influence of social disadvantage on infant outcomes in the UK. The magnitude of effect is similar across a range of area and individual deprivation measures and birth and mortality outcomes. Further research should explore the factors that are more proximal to mothers and infants, to help throw light on the most appropriate times to provide support and the form(s) that this support should take.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000964

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Marmot M Wilkinson RG . The Social Determinants of Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  2. 10.1093/geronb/60.Special_Issue_2.S27 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Department of Health. Fair Society, Healthy Lives. The Marmot review. Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010. London: Department of Health, 2010. http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review (accessed 16 Jan 2012).
  4. Keating DP Hertzman C , eds. Development Health and the Wealth of Nations. Social, Biological and Educational Dynamics. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
  5. Li, 2009, Social determinants of child health and wellbeing (editorial), Health Sociol Rev, 18, 3, 10.5172/hesr.18.1.3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60703-9 · DOI
  7. Bradshaw, 2009, An index of child well-being in Europe, Child Indicators Res, 2, 319, 10.1007/s12187-009-9037-7 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0 · DOI
  9. Carstairs V Morris R . Deprivation and Health in Scotland. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1991.
  10. 10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1587 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/ije/dym018 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bundred, 2003, Social trends in singleton births and birth weight in Wirral residents, 1990-2001, Arch Dis Child, 88, F421, 10.1136/fn.88.5.F421 · DOI
  13. 10.1136/jech.2005.042853 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Spencer, 1999, Socioeconomic status and birth weight: comparison of an area-based measure with the registrar general's social class, J Epidemiol Community Health, 53, 495, 10.1136/jech.53.8.495 · DOI
  15. Collingwood Bakeo, 2006, Risk factors for low birthweight based on birth registration and census information, England and Wales, 1981-2000, Health Stat Q, 30, 15
  16. 10.1136/bmj.b3754 · DOI
  17. Pattenden, 1999, Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and “lone mother” status, J Epidemiol Community Health, 53, 355, 10.1136/jech.53.6.355 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/jech.2005.038380 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Maher, 2004, Trends in live births and birthweight by social class, marital status and mother's age, 1976–2000, Health Stat Q, 23, 34
  20. 10.1136/bmj.b4702 · DOI
  21. Gray, 2008, Social inequalities in preterm birth in Scotland 1980-2003: findings from an area-based measure of deprivation, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 115, 82, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01582.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1186/1756-0500-3-119 · DOI
  23. 10.1136/adc.2003.036111 · DOI
  24. 10.1057/hsq.2009.15 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Whitehead, 1999, Narrowing social inequalities in health? Analysis of trends in mortality among babies of lone mothers, BMJ, 318, 908, 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.908 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/bmj.c6654 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00688.x · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60030-0 · DOI
  29. Wright, 1994, Effect of deprivation on weight gain in infancy, Acta Paediatr, 83, 357, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb18119.x · DOI
  30. Gardosi, 2010, Social deprivation, smoking and maternal characteristics as risk factors for small-for-gestational age birthweight, Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 95, 90
  31. 10.1136/adc.2002.018937 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01083.x · DOI
  33. 10.1136/adc.84.4.307 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/1741-7015-2-27 · DOI
  35. 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00152.x · DOI
  36. 10.1136/adc.2005.071530 · DOI
  37. 10.1136/adc.2008.146464 · DOI
  38. Sanderson, 2002, Is postnatal depression a risk factor for sudden infant death?, Br J Gen Pract, 52, 636
  39. 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1457 · DOI
  40. Brooke, 1997, Case-control study of sudden infant death syndrome in Scotland. 1992-5, BMJ, 314, 1516, 10.1136/bmj.314.7093.1516 · DOI
  41. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00465.x · DOI
  42. 10.1136/bmj.b3666 · DOI
  43. 10.1136/jech.2003.011551 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/ije/dyh100 · DOI
  45. 10.1136/adc.2005.091496 · DOI
  46. 10.1136/jech.52.7.451 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00214-3 · DOI
  48. 10.1017/S0007114509990444 · DOI
  49. 10.1136/bmj.c3428 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Savitz DA Pastore LM . Causes of prematurity. In: McCormick MC Siegel JE , eds. Prenatal Care: Effectiveness and Implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. · DOI
  51. 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816f2709 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s10995-005-0021-7 · DOI
  53. 10.1089/jwh.2010.2051 · DOI
  54. Hodnett ED Fredericks S Weston J . Support during pregnancy for women at increased risk of low birthweight babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(6):CD000198. http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD000198/pdf_fs.html (accessed 16 Jan 2012). · DOI
  55. Spiby, 2009, A systematic review of education and evidence-based practice interventions with health professionals and breast feeding counsellors on duration of breast feeding, Midwifery, 25, 50, 10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.006 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-13 · DOI
  57. 10.1136/bmj.b4254 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s10995-010-0603-x · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1136/jech.2010.124198 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Weightman, A. L., Morgan, H. E., Shepherd, M. A., Kitcher, H., Roberts, C., & Dunstan, F. D.
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
e000964
ISSN
2044-6055
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000964
Cited by
113
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.