Cited by 181Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults started on artificial nutrition support: prospective cohort study

Open access
Rio, Alan, Whelan, Kevin, Goff, Louise, Reidlinger, Dianne Patricia, Smeeton, Nigel·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Background: Refeeding syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition characterised by severe intracellular electrolyte shifts, acute circulatory fluid overload and organ failure. The initial symptoms are non-specific but early clinical features are severely low-serum electrolyte concentrations of potassium, phosphate or magnesium. Risk factors for the syndrome include starvation, chronic alcoholism, anorexia nervosa and surgical interventions that require lengthy periods of fasting. The causes of the refeeding syndrome are excess or unbalanced enteral, parenteral or oral nutritional intake. Prevention of the syndrome includes identification of individuals at risk, controlled hypocaloric nutritional intake and supplementary electrolyte replacement. Objective: To determine the occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults commenced on artificial nutrition support. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Large, single site university teaching hospital. Recruitment period 2007–2009. Participants: 243 adults started on artificial nutrition support for the first time during that admission recruited from wards and intensive care. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: occurrence of the refeeding syndrome. Secondary outcome: analysis of the risk factors which predict the refeeding syndrome. Tertiary outcome: mortality due to refeeding syndrome and all-cause mortality. Results: 133 participants had one or more of the following risk factors: body mass index <16–18.5≥(kg/m 2 ), unintentional weight loss >15% in the preceding 3–6 months, very little or no nutritional intake >10 days, history of alcohol or drug abuse and low baseline levels of serum potassium, phosphate or magnesium prior to recruitment. Poor nutritional intake for more than 10 days, weight loss >15% prior to recruitment and low-serum magnesium level at baseline predicted the refeeding syndrome with a sensitivity of 66.7%: specificity was >80% apart from weight loss of >15% which was 59.1%. Baseline low-serum magnesium was an independent predictor of the refeeding syndrome (p=0.021). Three participants (2% 3/243) developed severe electrolyte shifts, acute circulatory fluid overload and disturbance to organ function following artificial nutrition support and were diagnosed with refeeding syndrome. There were no deaths attributable to the refeeding syndrome, but (5.3% 13/243) participants died during the feeding period and (28% 68/243) died during hospital admission. Death of these participants was due to cerebrovascular accident, traumatic injury, respiratory failure, organ failure or end-of-life causes. Conclusions: Refeeding syndrome was a rare, survivable phenomenon that occurred during hypocaloric nutrition support in participants identified at risk. Independent predictors for refeeding syndrome were starvation and baseline low-serum magnesium concentration. Intravenous carbohydrate infusion prior to artificial nutrition support may have precipitated the onset of the syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002173

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mild hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl, 3.9 mmol/l) is associated with increased mortality.

    “A number of observational studies confirmed a strong association between severe hyperglycemia (> 180 mg/dl, 10 mmol/l) (355), marked glycemic variability (coefficient of variation > 20%) (356, 357), mild hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl, 3.9 mmol/l) (358) and increased mortality.”

    From ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. (2019) · cites this paper as [358]

    The Results table reports low potassium, phosphate and magnesium values alongside mortality, but does not report blood-glucose measurements or an association between mild hypoglycemia and mortality. A search for hypoglycemia and blood glucose found no passage addressing the claimed <70 mg/dl threshold. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Solomon SM Kirby DF The refeeding syndrome: a review. JPEN 1990; 14: 90– 7 2109122
  2. [2]Schnitker MA Mattman PE Bliss TL A clinical study of malnutrition in Japanese prisoners of war. Ann Intern Med 1951; 35: 69– 96 14847450
  3. [4]Crook MA Hally V Panteli JV The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition 2001; 17: 632– 7 11448586
  4. [5]Weinsier RL Krumdieck CL Death resulting from overzealous total parenteral nutrition: The refeeding syndrome revisited. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 393– 9 6782855
  5. [6]Zeki S Culkin A Gabe SM Refeeding hypophosphataemia is more common in enteral than parenteral feeding in adult patients. Clin Nutr 2011; 30:365– 8 21256638
  6. [7]Kaganski M Levy S Koren-Morag N Hypophosphataemia in the elderly is associated with the refeeding syndrome and reduced survival. J Intern Med 2005; 257:461– 8 15836663
  7. [8]Flesher ME Archer KA Leslie BD Assessing the metabolic and clinical consequences of early enteral feeding in the malnourished patient. JPEN 2005; 29: 108– 17 15772389
  8. [9]Schofield WN Schofield C James WPT Basal metabolic rate. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39: 1– 96 4044297
  9. [12]King AL Sica DA Miller G Severe hypophosphataemia in a general hospital population. South Med J 1987; 80: 831– 5 3603104
  10. [13]Hoffman M Zemlin AE Meyer WP Hypophosphataemia at a large academic hospital in south Africa. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 1104– 7 18820097
  11. [14]Betro MG Pain RW Hypophosphataemia and hyperphosphataemia in a hospital population. BMJ 1972; 1: 273– 6 5008477 PMC1787150
  12. [15]Guillou PJ Morgan DB Hill GL Hypophosphataemia: a complication of innocuous glucose saline. Lancet 1976; 308: 710– 12 61395
  13. [16]Patel U Sriram K Acute respiratory failure due to refeeding syndrome and hypophosphataemia induced by hypocaloric enteral nutrition. Nutrition 2009; 25: 364– 7 19062257
  14. [17]Brown EL Jenkins BA Gwynne A case of respiratory failure complicated by acute hypophosphataemia. Anaesthesia 1980; 35: 42– 5 7396111
  15. [18]Heymsfield SB Bethel RA Ansley JD Cardiac abnormalities in cachectic patients before and during nutritional repletion. Am Heart J 1978; 95: 584– 94 416704
  16. [19]Faintuch J Soriano FG Ladeira JP Refeeding procedures after 43 days of total fasting. Nutrition 2001; 17: 100– 4 11240336
  17. [20]Korbonitis M Blaine D Elia M Metabolic and hormonal changes during the refeeding period of prolonged fasting. Eur J Endocrinol 2007; 157: 157– 66 17656593
  18. [21]Whitelaw M Gilbertson H Lam PY Does aggressive refeeding in hospitalized adolescents with anorexia nervosa result in increased hypophosphataemia? J Adolescent Health 2010; 46: 577– 82 20472215
  19. [22]Cumming AD Farquhar JR Bouchier A Refeeding hypophosphataemia in anorexia nevosa and alcoholism. BMJ 1987; 295: 490– 1 3117183 PMC1247340
  20. [23]Terlevich A Hearing SD Woltersdorf WW Refeeding syndrome: effective and safe treatment with Phosphates Polyfusor. Aliment Pharm Therap 2003; 7: 1325– 9 12755846
  21. [24]Mehanna HM Moledina J Travis J Refeeding syndrome: what it is and how to prevent and treat it. BMJ 2008; 336: 1495– 8 18583681 PMC2440847

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rio, A., Whelan, K., Goff, L., Reidlinger, D. P., & Smeeton, N.
Affiliations
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rio, Alan
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
e002173
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156053215
Cited by
181
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
refeeding syndrome, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, risk factors, serum magnesium, hypomagnesemia, electrolyte shifts, low body mass index, unintentional weight loss, mortality, adults, intensive care, organ failure, fluid overload, alcoholism, anorexia nervosa, starvation, electrolyte replacement, hypocaloric diet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review