Cited by 99Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesPain Management and Opioid Use

Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: results from a randomised controlled exploratory trial

Open access
Bruhn, Hanne, Bond, Christine M, Elliott, Alison M, Hannaford, Philip C, Lee, Amanda J, McNamee, Paul, Smith, Blair H, Watson, Margaret C +2 more·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of pharmacist medication review, with or without pharmacist prescribing, with standard care, for patients with chronic pain. Design: An exploratory randomised controlled trial. Setting: Six general practices with prescribing pharmacists in Grampian (3) and East Anglia (3). Participants: Patients on repeat prescribed pain medication (4815) were screened by general practitioners (GPs), and mailed invitations (1397). 196 were randomised and 180 (92%) completed. Exclusion criteria included: severe mental illness, terminally ill, cancer related pain, history of addiction. Randomisation and intervention: Patients were randomised using a remote telephone service to: (1) pharmacist medication review with face-to-face pharmacist prescribing; (2) pharmacist medication review with feedback to GP and no planned patient contact or (3) treatment as usual (TAU). Blinding was not possible. Outcome measures: Outcomes were the SF-12v2, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), the Health Utilities Index 3 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcomes were collected at 0, 3 and 6 months. Results: In the prescribing arm (n=70) two patients were excluded/nine withdrew. In the review arm (n=63) one was excluded/three withdrew. In the TAU arm (n=63) four withdrew. Compared with baseline, patients had an improved CPG in the prescribing arm, 47.7% (21/44; p=0.003) and in the review arm, 38.6% (17/44; p=0.001), but not the TAU group, 31.3% (15/48; ns). The SF-12 Physical Component Score showed no effect in the prescribing or review arms but improvement in TAU (p=0.02). The SF-12 Mental Component Score showed no effect for the prescribing or review arms and deterioration in the TAU arm (p=0.002). HADS scores improved within the prescribing arm for depression (p=0.022) and anxiety (p=0.007), between groups (p=0.022 and p=0.045, respectively). Conclusions: This is the first randomised controlled trial of pharmacist prescribing in the UK, and suggests that there may be a benefit for patients with chronic pain. A larger trial is required. Trial registration: www.isrctn.org/ISRCTN06131530 . Medical Research Council funding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002361

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pharmacist prescribing in primary care has the potential to confer additional benefit over medication review alone.

    “Pharmacists have expertise in therapeutics and polypharmacy, and new research demonstrates that pharmacist prescribing in primary care has the potential to confer additional benefit over medication review alone [64].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edn New York: Academic Press, 1988
  2. [32]Gureje O Von Korff M, Persistent pain and well-being. A World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA 1998; 280: 147– 51 9669787
  3. [37]Anonymous Pharmacist and physiotherapist-led community outreach pain programme improve quality of life. Pharm J 2005; 275: 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruhn, H., Bond, C. M., Elliott, A. M., Hannaford, P. C., Lee, A. J., McNamee, P., Smith, B. H., Watson, M. C., Holland, R., & Wright, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Bond, Christine M
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
e002361
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994295201
Cited by
99
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, pharmacist prescribing, pharmacist medication review, primary care, analgesics, quality of life, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, health utility, SF-12, prescribing appropriateness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review