Cited by 68Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Experiences of patients and professionals participating in the HITS home blood pressure telemonitoring trial: a qualitative study

Open access
Hanley, Janet, Ure, Jenny, Pagliari, Claudia, Sheikh, Aziz, McKinstry, Brian·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the experiences of patients and professionals taking part in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of remote blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring supported by primary care. To identify factors facilitating or hindering the effectiveness of the intervention and those likely to influence its potential translation to routine practice. Design: Qualitative study adopting a qualitative descriptive approach. Participants: 25 patients, 11 nurses and 9 doctors who were participating in an RCT of BP telemonitoring. A maximum variation sample of patients from within the trial based on age, sex and deprivation status of the practice was sought. Setting: 6 primary care practices in Scotland. Method: Data were collected via taped semistructured interviews. Initial thematic analysis was inductive. Multiple strategies were employed to ensure that the analysis was credible and trustworthy. Results: Prior to the trial, both patients and professionals were reluctant to increase the medication based on single BP measurements taken in the surgery. BP measurements based on multiple electronic readings were perceived as more accurate as a basis for action. Patients using telemonitoring became more engaged in the clinical management of their condition. Professionals reported that telemonitoring challenged existing roles and work practices and increased workload. Lack of integration of telemonitoring data with the electronic health record was perceived as a drawback. Conclusions: BP telemonitoring in a usual care setting can provide a trusted basis for medication management and improved BP control. It increases patients’ engagement in the management of their condition, but supporting telemetry and greater patient engagement can increase professional workloads and demand changes in service organisation. Successful service design in practice would have to take account of how additional roles and responsibilities could be realigned with existing work and data management practices. The embedded qualitative study was included in the protocol for the HITS trial registered with ISRCTN no. 72614272.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002671

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Barlow J Hendy J Adopting integrated mainstream telecare services: lessons from the UK. Eurohealth 2009; 15: 8– 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanley, J., Ure, J., Pagliari, C., Sheikh, A., & McKinstry, B.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Hanley, Janet
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
e002671
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155829918
Cited by
68
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Bupa Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
home blood pressure telemonitoring, hypertension, patient experience, professional experience, primary care, patient engagement, medication management, workload, electronic health records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review