Cited by 45Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth and Medical Research ImpactsGlobal Health and Surgery

Understanding the investigators: a qualitative study investigating the barriers and enablers to the implementation of local investigator-initiated clinical trials in Ethiopia

Open access
Franzen, Samuel R P, Chandler, Clare, Enquselassie, Fikre, Siribaddana, Sisira, Atashili, Julius, Angus, Brian, Lang, Trudie·2013·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical trials provide ‘gold standard’ evidence for policy, but insufficient locally relevant trials are conducted in low-income and middle-income countries. Local investigator-initiated trials could generate highly relevant data for national governments, but information is lacking on how to facilitate them. We aimed to identify barriers and enablers to investigator-initiated trials in Ethiopia to inform and direct capacity strengthening initiatives. Design: Exploratory, qualitative study comprising of in-depth interviews (n=7) and focus group discussions (n=3). Setting: Fieldwork took place in Ethiopia during March 2011. Participants: Local health researchers with previous experiences of clinical trials or stakeholders with an interest in trials were recruited through snowball sampling (n=20). Outcome measures: Detailed discussion notes were analysed using thematic coding analysis and key themes were identified. Results: All participants perceived investigator-initiated trials as important for generating local evidence. System and organisational barriers included: limited funding allocation, weak regulatory and administrative systems, few learning opportunities, limited human and material capacity and poor incentives for conducting research. Operational hurdles were symptomatic of these barriers. Lack of awareness, confidence and motivation to undertake trials were important individual barriers. Training, knowledge sharing and experience exchange were key enablers to trial conduct and collaboration was unanimously regarded as important for improving capacity. Conclusions: Barriers to trial conduct were found at individual, operational, organisational and system levels. These findings indicate that to increase locally led trial conduct in Ethiopia, system wide changes are needed to create a more receptive and enabling research environment. Crucially, the creation of research networks between potential trial groups could provide much needed practical collaborative support through sharing of financial and project management burdens, knowledge and resources. These findings could have important implications for capacity-strengthening initiatives but further research is needed before the results can be generalised more widely.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003616

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles.

    “Delays in regulatory and ethical review were mentioned in most articles [40, 42, 45, 46, 48, 49, 52].”
  • Over-complex and unreasonably strict ethical and regulatory systems were reported in some articles.

    “Over-complex and unreasonably strict ethical and regulatory systems were also reported in some articles [48, 49, 51].”
  • Four articles reported that the presence of unskilled authorities in the review process posed a barrier to conducting clinical trials.

    “Four articles reported that the presence of unskilled authorities in the review process posed a barrier to conducting clinical trials [42, 45, 48, 49].”
  • Many articles reported that lack of time and other competing priorities related to competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities was an issue.

    “Many articles reported that lack of time [40, 48, 51, 53] and other competing priorities related to the competing demands of working multiple jobs and their attendant responsibilities [40, 43, 45, 46, 48, 51, 53] was an issue.”
  • The majority of articles stated that the administrative environment was characterized by lengthy and complex logistic and financial systems that hampered the conduct of clinical trials.

    “The majority of the articles [43, 45, 47, 48, 51, 52] stated that the administrative environment was characterized by lengthy and complex logistic and financial systems that hampered the conduct of clinical trials.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franzen, S. R. P., Chandler, C., Enquselassie, F., Siribaddana, S., Atashili, J., Angus, B., & Lang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Rajarata University of Sri Lanka (LK)
  • University of Buea (CM)
Corresponding author
Franzen, Samuel R P
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-11
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
e003616
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137693318
Cited by
45
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1053843)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
investigator-initiated trials, barriers and facilitators, research capacity building, research funding, clinical trial regulation, research incentives, research training, research networks, low- and middle-income countries, Ethiopia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review