The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To examine: (1) changes in polypharmacy in 1997, 2002, 2007 and 2012 and; (2) changes in potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) prevalence and the relationship between PIP and polypharmacy in individuals aged ≥65 years over this period in Ireland. Methods: This repeated cross-sectional study using pharmacy claims data included all individuals eligible for the General Medical Services scheme in the former Eastern Health Board region of Ireland in 1997, 2002, 2007 and 2012 (range 338 025–539 752 individuals). Outcomes evaluated were prevalence of polypharmacy (being prescribed ≥5 regular medicines) and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 regular medicines) in all individuals and PIP prevalence in those aged ≥65 years determined by 30 criteria from the Screening Tool for Older Persons’ Prescriptions. Results: The prevalence of polypharmacy increased from 1997 to 2012, particularly among older individuals (from 17.8% to 60.4% in those aged ≥65 years). The adjusted incident rate ratio for polypharmacy in 2012 compared to 1997 was 4.16 (95% CI 3.23 to 5.36), and for excessive polypharmacy it was 10.53 (8.58 to 12.91). Prevalence of PIP rose from 32.6% in 1997 to 37.3% in 2012. High-dose aspirin and digoxin prescribing decreased over time, but long-term proton pump inhibitors at maximal dose increased substantially (from 0.8% to 23.8%). The odds of having any PIP in 2012 were lower compared to 1997 after controlling for gender and level of polypharmacy, OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.4). Conclusions: Accounting for the marked increase in polypharmacy, prescribing quality appears to have improved with a reduction in the odds of having PIP from 1997 to 2012. With growing numbers of people taking multiple regular medicines, strategies to address the related challenges of polypharmacy and PIP are needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barnett, K., Mercer, S. W., Norbury, M., Watt, G., Wyke, S., & Guthrie, B. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60240-2 · Cited by 6,972
Gardner, W. P., Mulvey, E. P., & Shaw, E. C. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.118.3.392 · Cited by 1,836
Gallagher, P., Ryan, C., Byrne, S., Kennedy, J., & OMahony, D. (2008) · Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.5414/cpp46072 · Cited by 1,506
Lovastatin and beyond: the history of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors
Tobert, J. A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1112 · Cited by 875
Benzodiazepine Use in the United States
Olfson, M., King, M., & Schoenbaum, M. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1763 · Cited by 786
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people
Patterson, S. M., Cadogan, C. A., Kerse, N., Cardwell, C. R., Bradley, M. C., Ryan, C., & Hughes, C. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub3 · Cited by 754
Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Elderly Home Care Patients in Europe
Fialová, D. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.11.1348 · Cited by 707
IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics
Evans, R. (2014) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns2014.04.28.32.30.s36 · Cited by 594
Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity
Guthrie, B., Payne, K., Alderson, P., McMurdo, M. E. T., & Mercer, S. W. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e6341 · Cited by 530
Use of medications and polypharmacy are increasing among the elderly
Linjakumpu, T., Hartikainen, S., Klaukka, T., Veijola, J., Kivelä, S.-L., & Isoaho, R. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00411-0 · Cited by 509
Cited by
An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review
Wastesson, J. W., Morin, L., Tan, E. C. K., & Johnell, K. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2018.1546841 · Cited by 617
Polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review of definitions, epidemiology and consequences
Pazan, F., & Wehling, M. (2021) · European Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00479-3 · Cited by 542
Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis
Oscanoa, T. J., Lizaraso, F., & Carvajal, A. (2017) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2225-3 · Cited by 382
Lukacena, K. M., Keck, J. W., Freeman, P. R., Harrington, N. G., Huffmyer, M. J., & Moga, D. C. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/20420986221116465 · Cited by 29
(2022) · doi:10.1186/s40814-022-01018-y · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Moriarty, F., Hardy, C., Bennett, K., Smith, S. M., & Fahey, T.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e008656
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2194138443
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008656
- The paper
- Moriarty, F., Hardy, C., Bennett, K., Smith, S. M., & Fahey, T. (2015). Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.