The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Older people experience more concurrent illnesses, are prescribed more medications and suffer more adverse drug events than younger people. Many drugs predispose older people to adverse events such as falls and cognitive impairment, thus increasing morbidity and health resource utilization. At the same time, older people are often denied potentially beneficial, clinically indicated medications without a valid reason. We aimed to validate a new screening tool of older persons' prescriptions incorporating criteria for potentially inappropriate drugs called STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions) and criteria for potentially appropriate, indicated drugs called START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right, i.e. appropriate, indicated Treatment). METHODS: A Delphi consensus technique was used to establish the content validity of STOPP/START. An 18-member expert panel from academic centers in Ireland and the United Kingdom completed two rounds of the Delphi process by mail survey. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by determining the kappa-statistic for measure of agreement on 100 data-sets. RESULTS: STOPP is comprised of 65 clinically significant criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people. Each criterion is accompanied by a concise explanation as to why the prescribing practice is potentially inappropriate. START consists of 22 evidence-based prescribing indicators for commonly encountered diseases in older people. Inter-rater reliability is favorable with a kappa-coefficient of 0.75 for STOPP and 0.68 for START. CONCLUSION: STOPP/START is a valid, reliable and comprehensive screening tool that enables the prescribing physician to appraise an older patient's prescription drugs in the context of his/her concurrent diagnoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002 · Cited by 3,740
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3
O’Mahony, D., Cherubini, A., Guiteras, A. R., Denkinger, M., Beuscart, J.-B., Onder, G., Gudmundsson, A., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Knol, W., Bahat, G., et al. (2023) · European Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y · Cited by 703
“The first version of STOPP/ START in 2008 included 65 STOPP and 22 START criteria [3].”
BackgroundMethodHealth Outcomes Associated with Polypharmacy in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Fried, T. R., O'Leary, J., Towle, V., Goldstein, M. K., Trentalange, M., & Martin, D. K. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13153 · Cited by 721
Gallagher, P., & O'Mahony, D. (2008) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afn197 · Cited by 697
Self-citationAdverse drug reactions in special populations – the elderly
Davies, E. A., & O'Mahony, M. S. (2015) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.12596 · Cited by 604
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallagher, P., Ryan, C., Byrne, S., Kennedy, J., & OMahony, D.
- Venue
- Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Dustri-Verlgag Dr. Karl Feistle
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 72-83
- ISSN
- 0946-1965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1524993883
- Cited by
- 1,506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5414/cpp46072
- The paper
- Gallagher, P., Ryan, C., Byrne, S., Kennedy, J., & OMahony, D. (2008). STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment). Consensus validation. Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.5414/cpp46072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.