Cited by 112Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerMedication Adherence and Compliance

Cost-related non-adherence to prescribed medicines among older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of a survey in 11 developed countries

Open access
Morgan, Steven G, Lee, Augustine·2017·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effects of costs on access to medicines in 11 developed countries offering different levels of prescription drug coverage for their populations. Design: Cross-sectional study of data from the Commonwealth Fund 2014 International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults. Setting: Telephone survey conducted in 11 high-income countries: Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and the USA. Participants: 22 532 adults aged 55 and older and living in the community in studied countries. Primary outcome measure: Self-reported cost-related non-adherence (CRNA) in the form of either not filling a prescription or skipping doses within the last 12 months because of out-of-pocket costs. Results: Estimated prevalence of CRNA among all older adults varied from <3% in the France, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK to 16.8% in the USA. Canada had the second highest national prevalence of CRNA (8.3%), followed by Australia (6.8%). Older adults in the USA were approximately six times more likely to report CRNA than older adults in the UK (adjusted OR=6.09; 95% CI 3.60 to 10.20). Older adults in Australia and Canada were also statistically significantly more likely to report CRNA than older adults in the UK. Across most countries, the prevalence of CRNA was higher among lower income residents and lower among residents over age 65. Conclusions: Observed differences in national prevalence of CRNA appear to follow lines of availability of prescription drug coverage and the extent of direct patient charges for prescriptions under available drug plans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014287

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High prices are barriers to access to medications, particularly for antiobesity medications.

    “It is well established that high prices are barriers to access to medications, particularly for AOMs [12].”

    From Estimated minimum prices and lowest available national prices for antiobesity medications: Improving affordability and access to treatment (2023) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction says costs are a common cause of prescription non-adherence, and the Conclusion associates higher patient costs with greater risk of access barriers. The paper studies prescribed medicines among older adults generally; it does not establish that the barrier is particularly pronounced for antiobesity medications. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, S. G., & Lee, A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Steven G
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e014287
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583329548
Cited by
112
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9
FWCI
24.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Commonwealth Fund (20160646)
  • Institute of Gender and Health (DCO150GP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
cost-related nonadherence, medication adherence, older adults, prescription drug coverage, out-of-pocket costs, access to medicines, income inequality, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Aged, Australia, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Health Expenditures, Female, Humans, Income, Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Drug Monitoring, Cost of Illness, Developed Countries, Insurance Coverage, Universal Health Insurance, Medication Adherence, Prescription Drugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review