Cited by 62Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Policy Implementation ScienceGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Community health worker-delivered counselling for common mental disorders among chronic disease patients in South Africa: a feasibility study

Open access
Myers, Bronwyn, Petersen-Williams, Petal, van der Westhuizen, Claire, Lund, Crick, Lombard, Carl, Joska, John A, Levitt, Naomi S, Butler, Christopher +4 more·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of integrating a ‘designated’ approach to community health worker (CHW)-delivered mental health counselling (where existing CHWs deliver counselling in addition to usual duties) and a ‘dedicated’ approach (where additional CHWs have the sole responsibility of delivering mental health counselling) into chronic disease care. Design: A feasibility test of a designated and dedicated approach to CHW-delivered counselling and qualitative interviews of CHWs delivering the counselling. Setting: Four primary healthcare clinics in the Western Cape, South Africa allocated to either a designated or dedicated approach and stratified by urban/rural status. Participants: Forty chronic disease patients (20 with HIV, 20 with diabetes) reporting hazardous alcohol use or depression. Interviews with seven CHWs. Intervention: Three sessions of structured mental health counselling. Main outcome measures: We assessed feasibility by examining the proportion of patients who were willing to be screened, met inclusion criteria, provided consent, completed counselling and were retained in the study. Acceptability of these delivery approaches was assessed through qualitative interviews of CHWs. Results: Regardless of approach, a fair proportion (67%) of eligible patients were willing to receive mental health counselling. Patients who screened positive for depression were more likely to be interested in counselling than those with hazardous alcohol only. Retention in counselling (85%) and the study (90%) was good and did not differ by approach. Both dedicated and designated CHWs viewed the counselling package as highly acceptable but requested additional training and support to facilitate implementation. Conclusions: Dedicated and designated approaches to CHW-delivered mental health counselling were matched in terms of their feasibility and acceptability. A comparative efficacy trial of these approaches is justified, with some adjustments to the training and implementation protocols to provide further support to CHWs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024277

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sample sizes for the mixed methods studies ranged from 40 to 4,865.

    “for the mixed methods studies from 40 [78] to 4,865 [79]”
  • In chronic disease patients in South Africa, of the 553 screened, 262 (48%) were potentially eligible, 26% declined screening, 101 met inclusion criteria, 67 (66%) of eligible patients were interested, and only 40 returned for enrolment.

    “Of the 553 chronic disease patients screened for recent alcohol use and depressed mood, 262 (48%) were potentially eligible for study inclusion and referred for eligibility screening. About a quarter (26%, n = 69) declined screening, mainly due to lack of time or interest. Of the 193 remaining patients, 101 met inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients (16%) were eligible on their AUDIT scores, 69 (58%”
  • In chronic disease patients in South Africa, all CHWs viewed the intervention as acceptable and beneficial to patients with chronic disease.

    “All CHWs viewed the intervention as acceptable and beneficial to patients with chronic disease”
  • In chronic disease patients in South Africa, the primary outcomes supported the feasibility of a larger study.

    “The primary outcomes supported the feasibility of a larger study.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Ritchie J, Spencer L Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research in A. London Routledge: Analysing qualitative data, 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, B., Petersen-Williams, P., van der Westhuizen, C., Lund, C., Lombard, C., Joska, J. A., Levitt, N. S., Butler, C., Naledi, T., Milligan, P., Stein, D. J., & Sorsdahl, K.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
Corresponding author
Myers, Bronwyn
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e024277
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909072240
Cited by
62
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
community health workers, mental health counseling, common mental disorders, depression, hazardous drinking, chronic care, HIV, diabetes mellitus, primary care, feasibility, acceptability, mental health integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Community Health Workers, Counseling, Delivery of Health Care, Depressive Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Primary Health Care, Problem Solving, South Africa, HIV Infections, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review