Cited by 53Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchUrinary Tract Infections Management

Antifungal (oral and vaginal) therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a systematic review protocol

Open access
Lírio, Juliana, Giraldo, Paulo Cesar, Amaral, Rose Luce, Sarmento, Ayane Cristine Alves, Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira, Gonçalves, Ana Katherine·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is frequent in women worldwide and usually responds rapidly to topical or oral antifungal therapy. However, some women develop recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), which is arbitrarily defined as four or more episodes every year. RVVC is a debilitating, long-term condition that can severely affect the quality of life of women. Most VVC is diagnosed and treated empirically and women frequently self-treat with over-the-counter medications that could contribute to an increase in the antifungal resistance. The effective treatment of RVVC has been a challenge in daily clinical practice. This review aims to assess the efficacy of antifungal agents administered orally or intravaginally for the treatment of RVVC, in order to define clinical practices that will impact on the reduction of the morbidity and antifungal resistance. Methods and analysis: A comprehensive search of the following databases will be carried out: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Virtual Health Library)/Biblioteca Regional de Medicina (Regional Library of Medicine) (BVS/BIREME), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and in the clinical trials databases ( www.trialscentral.org ; www.controlled-trials.com ; www.clinicaltrials.gov ). The risk of bias will be assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We will perform data synthesis using the Review Manager (RevMan) software V.5.2.3. To assess heterogeneity, we will compute the I2 statistic. Ethics and dissemination: This study will be a review of published data and it is not necessary to obtain ethical approval. Findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: CRD42018093817

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027489

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common treatment schedule for RVVC is induction therapy with a topical antifungal drug or oral fluconazole at 150 mg for 10-14 days, then oral fluconazole 150 mg for 6 months.

    “The most common treatment schedule for RVVC is induction therapy with a topical antifungal drug or oral fluconazole at a dose of 150 mg for 10–14 days, and then oral fluconazole is given at a dose of 150 mg for 6 months.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lírio, J., Giraldo, P. C., Amaral, R. L., Sarmento, A. C. A., Costa, A. P. F., & Gonçalves, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
Corresponding author
Gonçalves, Ana Katherine
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e027489
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946041412
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, antifungal therapy, oral antifungal agents, antifungal resistance, treatment efficacy, quality of life, women's health
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Administration, Intravaginal, Administration, Oral, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Nonprescription Drugs, Female, Humans, Recurrence, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review