Cited by 35Thermal Regulation in MedicineInfrared Thermography in MedicineHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Evaluation of a wearable wireless device with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor WT705, for continuous temperature monitoring for patients in surgical wards: a prospective comparative study

Open access
Liu, Yuwei, Liu, Changqing, Gao, Min, Wang, Yan, Bai, Yangjing, Xu, Ruihua, Gong, Renrong·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new-generation, non-invasive, wireless axillary thermometer with artificial intelligence, iThermonitor (WT705, Raiing Medical, Beijing, China), and to ascertain its feasibility for perioperative continuous body temperature monitoring in surgical patients. SETTING: Departments of Biliary Surgery and Operating Room and the post-anaesthesia care unit of a university teaching hospital in Chengdu, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 526 adult surgical patients were consecutively enrolled. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study. Axillary temperatures were continuously recorded with iThermonitor throughout the whole perioperative period. The temperatures of the contralateral armpit were measured with mercury thermometers at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 every day and were used as references. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were the accuracy and precision of the temperatures measured with iThermonitor, the validity to detect fever and the feasibility of continuous wear. Pairs of temperatures were evaluated with Student's t-test, Pearson's correlation and repeated-measures Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: 0.755, p<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranged from -0.63°C to 0.73°C, with 5.11% of the differences outside the 95% LoA. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.753. Continuous temperature monitoring captured more fevers than intermittent observation (117/526 vs 91/526, p<0.001), detected fever up to 4.35 hours earlier, and captured a higher peak temperature (0.29°C±0.27°C, 95% CI: 0.26-0.31). All subjects felt that wearing iThermonitor was more or less comfortable and did not affect their daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: iThermonitor is promising for continuous remote temperature monitoring in surgical patients. However, further developments are still needed to improve the precision of this device, especially for temperature detection in underweight patients and those with lower body temperature. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900024549; Results (registered on 5 July 2019).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039474

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 18 included studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias.

    “Overall, the 18 studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias (29–48).”
  • Liu et al. (34) evaluated the iThermonitor WT705, an AI-assisted wearable thermometer, in surgical wards; the device identified fevers in 22% of patients compared to 17% with standard mercury thermometers and detected fevers up to 4.35 h earlier.

    “Liu et al. (34) evaluated the iThermonitor WT705, an AI-assisted wearable thermometer, in surgical wards. The device identified fevers in 22% of patients compared to 17% with standard mercury thermometers and detected fevers up to 4.35 h earlier, allowing nurses to manage potential infections or complications proactively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Liu, C., Gao, M., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., Xu, R., & Gong, R.
Affiliations
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Renrong
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-11
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e039474
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3101682050
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Sichuan University West China Nursing Discipline Development Special Fund Project (NO.HXHL19031)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
perioperative monitoring, surgical patients, fever detection, non-invasive temperature measurement, artificial intelligence, remote patient monitoring
MeSH terms
Beijing, Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Body Temperature, China, Humans, Prospective Studies, Temperature, Thermometers, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review