Cited by 11Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Antihypertensive drug effects according to the pretreatment self-measured home blood pressure: the HOMED-BP study

Open access
Sano, Hikari, Hara, Azusa, Asayama, Kei, Miyazaki, Seiko, Kikuya, Masahiro, Imai, Yutaka, Ohkubo, Takayoshi·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To clarify whether or not the antihypertensive drug effect is proportional to the baseline pretreatment self-measured home blood pressure (HBP) in accordance with the law of initial value (Wilder’s law). Design: A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre clinical trial. Setting: Outpatients across Japan with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Participants: Among 3518 randomised participants, 2423 who self-measured HBP during the pretreatment drug-free period (10–28 days after starting fixed-dose antihypertensive monotherapy) with a mean 7.0 years follow-up were eligible. Main outcome measures: We analysed individual HBP readings during pretreatment and monotherapy. Results: The day-to-day HBP during both the pretreatment period and monotherapy period remains almost the same throughout each period; the results were consistent, regardless of the pretreatment HBP. Following monotherapy, the reduction in the HBP increased by 2.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.5 mm Hg) per 10 mm Hg pretreatment HBP increase, up to 11.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 9.9 to 12.0 mm Hg) among patients with an HBP ≥165 mm Hg during pretreatment. Among the 1005 patients receiving low-dose monotherapy (defined daily dose: 0.5 units), the reduction peaked at 8.9–9.1 mm Hg in those with pretreatment HBP 155–164 mm Hg and ≥165 mm Hg (p=0.88). Conclusions: According to Wilder’s law, the HBP reduction due to fixed-dose monotherapy was proportional to the pretreatment HBP without any regression to the mean phenomenon. With low-dose antihypertensive drugs, however, the HBP reduction peaked in patients with a high pretreatment HBP, indicating the need for such patients to receive a sufficient amount of antihypertensive drug medication at the initial treatment. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ), Unique identifier: C000000137.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040524

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [1]Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3021– 104. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 30165516 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, et al The Japanese Society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res 2019; 42: 1235– 481. 10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9 31375757 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ 2009; 338: b1665. 10.1136/bmj.b1665 19454737 PMC2684577 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Asayama K, Li Y, Franklin SS, et al Cardiovascular risk associated with white-coat hypertension: Con side of the argument. Hypertension 2017; 70: 676– 82. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.08902 28847889 · DOI
  5. [5]Imai Y, Hosaka M, Elnagar N, et al Clinical significance of home blood pressure measurements for the prevention and management of high blood pressure. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2014; 41: 37– 45. 10.1111/1440-1681.12142 23763494 · DOI
  6. [6]Imai Y, Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, et al Usefulness of home blood pressure measurements in assessing the effect of treatment in a single-blind placebo-controlled open trial. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 179– 85. 10.1097/00004872-200102000-00003 11212959 · DOI
  7. [7]Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 971– 5. 10.1097/00004872-199816070-00010 9794737 · DOI
  8. [8]Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al Prediction of stroke by self-measurement of blood pressure at home versus casual screening blood pressure measurement in relation to the joint National Committee 7 classification: the Ohasama study. Stroke 2004; 35: 2356– 61. 10.1161/01.STR.0000141679.42349.9f 15331792 · DOI
  9. [9]Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart association Task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension 2018; 71: e13– 115. 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065 29133356 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Schmieder RE, Schmidt ST, Riemer T, et al Disproportional decrease in office blood pressure compared with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure with antihypertensive treatment: dependency on pretreatment blood pressure levels. Hypertension 2014; 64: 1067– 72. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.03140 25259741 · DOI
  11. [11]Soranna D, Zambon A, Corrao G, et al Different effects of antihypertensive treatment on office and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2019; 37: 467– 75. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001914 30234773 · DOI
  12. [12]Wilder J Basimetric approach (law of initial value) to biological rhythms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1962; 98: 1211– 20. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb30629.x 14000687 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [13]Fujiwara T, Nishimura T, Ohkuko T, et al Rationale and design of HOMED-BP study: hypertension objective treatment based on measurement by electrical devices of blood pressure study. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7: 77– 82. 10.1097/00126097-200202000-00016 12040250 · DOI
  14. [15]Watabe D, Asayama K, Hanazawa T, et al Predictive power of home blood pressure indices at baseline and during follow-up in hypertensive patients: HOMED-BP study. Hypertens Res 2018; 41: 622– 8. 10.1038/s41440-018-0050-4 29808033 · DOI
  15. [16]Hansson L, Hedner T, Dahlöf B Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Blood Press 1992; 1: 113– 9. 10.3109/08037059209077502 1366259 · DOI
  16. [17]World Medical Association World Medical association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191– 4. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 24141714 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [18]Chonan K, Kikuya M, Araki T, et al Device for the self-measurement of blood pressure that can monitor blood pressure during sleep. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 203– 5. 10.1097/00126097-200108000-00008 11805470 · DOI
  18. [19]White WB, Anwar YA Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 107– 10. 10.1097/00126097-200104000-00007 11433132 · DOI
  19. [20]Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Hanazawa T, et al Does antihypertensive drug class affect day-to-day variability of self-measured home blood pressure? the HOMED-BP study. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5: e002995. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002995 27009620 PMC4943272 · DOI
  20. [21]Satoh M, Haga T, Hosaka M, et al The velocity of antihypertensive effects of seven angiotensin II receptor blockers determined by home blood pressure measurements. J Hypertens 2016; 34: 1218– 23. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000902 27027425 · DOI
  21. [23]Staessen J, Amery A, Fagard R Isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens 1990; 8: 393– 405. 10.1097/00004872-199005000-00001 2163412 · DOI
  22. [24]Kenward MG, Roger JH Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 1997; 53: 983– 97. 10.2307/2533558 9333350 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [25]Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Rakugi H, et al Comparison of blood pressure values-self-measured at home, measured at an unattended office, and measured at a conventional attended office. Hypertens Res 2019; 42: 1726– 37. 10.1038/s41440-019-0287-6 31222188 · DOI
  24. [26]Ogata S, Kamide K, Asayama K, et al Genome-Wide association study for white coat effect in Japanese middle-aged to elderly people: the HOMED-BP study. Clin Exp Hypertens 2018; 40: 363– 9. 10.1080/10641963.2017.1384481 29058489 · DOI
  25. [27]Messerli FH, Rexhaj E Of headwind and tailwind, regression to the mean and Wilder's principle. J Hypertens 2019; 37: 4– 5. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002010 30499915 · DOI
  26. [29]Vaur L, Dubroca I, Dutrey-Dupagne C, et al Superiority of home blood pressure measurements over office measurements for testing antihypertensive drugs. Blood Press Monit 1998; 3: 107– 14. 10212339
  27. [30]Moore MN, Atkins ER, Salam A, et al Regression to the mean of repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in five studies. J Hypertens 2019; 37: 24– 9. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001977 30499921 · DOI
  28. [31]Asayama K, Hozawa A, Taguri M, et al Blood pressure, heart rate, and double product in a pooled cohort: the Japan arteriosclerosis longitudinal study. J Hypertens 2017; 35: 1808– 15. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001399 28486272 · DOI
  29. [32]Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, et al Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289: 2363– 9. 10.1001/jama.289.18.2363 12746359 · DOI
  30. [33]Borden WB, Maddox TM, Tang F, et al Impact of the 2014 expert panel recommendations for management of high blood pressure on contemporary cardiovascular practice: insights from the NCDR PINNACLE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 2196– 203. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.022 25447261 · DOI
  31. [34]Xu W, Goldberg SI, Shubina M, et al Optimal systolic blood pressure target, time to intensification, and time to follow-up in treatment of hypertension: population based retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2015; 350: h158. 10.1136/bmj.h158 25655523 PMC4353282 · DOI
  32. [35]Gradman AH, Parisé H, Lefebvre P, et al Initial combination therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients: a matched cohort study. Hypertension 2013; 61: 309– 18. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.201566 23184383 · DOI
  33. [36]Spence JD, Rayner BL J curve and cuff artefact, and diagnostic inertia in resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2016; 67: 32– 3. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06562 26553233 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sano, H., Hara, A., Asayama, K., Miyazaki, S., Kikuya, M., Imai, Y., & Ohkubo, T.
Affiliations
  • Showa Pharmaceutical University (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Tohoku Institute for Management of Blood Pressure (JP)
  • Teikyo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Asayama, Kei
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e040524
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112516221
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grants-in-Aid for the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science fellows (25.7756, 25.9328)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (16K15359, 17H04126, 18K06759, 23390171, 25253059, 26860093)
  • Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation
  • Japan Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
essential hypertension, regression to the mean, blood pressure reduction
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Japan, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review