Cited by 18Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentBehavioral Health and Interventions

Use of behavioural activation to manage pain: a scoping review protocol

Open access
Walsh, Sandra, Jones, Martin, Gray, Richard John, Gillam, Marianne, Gunn, Kate M, Barker, Trevor, Eshetie, Tesfahun, Moseley, G Lorimer·2021·BMJ Open

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain is a distressing condition and often poorly treated and managed. Psychological therapies are considered first-line intervention for people with chronic pain. Common psychological therapies require extensive clinician training and specialist qualifications. One approach that does not need lengthy training nor specialist qualification, but has empirical support in other health domains, is behavioural activation (BA). BA seeks to increase engagement in behaviours that are valued by the person and progress through behaviours that can increase mood and develop skills that build satisfying routines. BA can help people to manage their condition through scheduling behaviours, promoting routine and mastery over their condition. The extent to which BA has been used to support people living with chronic pain is not clear. Methods and analysis: This scoping review aims to identify published studies describing the application of BA to support people living with chronic pain. To map the evidence regarding BA and chronic pain, including the study type and the associated evidence, a scoping review was adopted. The search will be conducted in bibliographic databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature. No date limits will be applied to the search strategy. Screening of titles and abstracts, and full-text screening, will be independently undertaken by two investigators using Covidence software. Any disagreement between investigators will be resolved by a third investigator. Data from included publications will be extracted using a customised data extraction tool. Ethics and dissemination: The scoping review is an analysis of existing data and therefore ethics approval is not required. The findings of this scoping review will further our understanding of how BA has been used to support people living with chronic pain and inform future training and education programmes in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041036

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [2]Mazzucchelli TG, Da silva M. The potential of behavioural activation for the treatment of chronic pain: an exploratory review. Clin Psychol 2016; 20: 5– 16. 10.1111/cp.12088 · DOI
  2. [3]Nicolson SE, Caplan JP, Williams DE, et al. Comorbid pain, depression, and anxiety: multifaceted pathology allows for multifaceted treatment. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009; 17: 407– 20. 10.3109/10673220903463226 19968455 · DOI
  3. [4]Surdea-Blaga T, Băban A, Dumitrascu DL. Psychosocial determinants of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 616– 26. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i7.616 22363132 PMC3281218 · DOI
  4. [5]Tang Q-L, Lin G-Y, Zhang M-Q. Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for the management of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 8605– 10. 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8605 24379577 PMC3870505 · DOI
  5. [7]Turk DC, Meichenbaum D, Genest M. Pain and behavioural medicine: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1983.
  6. [8]Cheng JOS, Cheng S-T. Effectiveness of physical and cognitive-behavioural intervention programmes for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2019; 14: E0223367. 10.1371/journal.pone.0223367 31600270 PMC6786598 · DOI
  7. [15]Lewinsohn PM. A behavioral approach to depression. essential papers on depression. New York: New York University Press, 1974: 150– 72.
  8. [16]Kanter JW, Puspitasari AJ. Global dissemination and implementation of behavioural activation. Lancet 2016; 388: 843– 4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31131-X 27461438 · DOI
  9. [22]Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 141– 6. 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050 26134548 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [23]Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8: 19– 32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [29]James, SL, Abate, D, Abate, KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2018; 392: 1789– 858 https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2818%2932335-3 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 30496104 PMC6227754 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, S., Jones, M., Gray, R. J., Gillam, M., Gunn, K. M., Barker, T., Eshetie, T., & Moseley, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Jones, Martin
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-06
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
e041036
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164799541
Cited by
18
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Funders
National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (ID1178444)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
behavioral activation, chronic pain, pain management, psychological intervention, routines, mood, clinician training
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Scoping Reviews As Topic, Scoping Reviews as Topic, Educational Status, Humans, Pain, Research Design, Databases, Bibliographic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review