Cited by 71Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

How Does Behavioural Activation Work? A Systematic Review of the Evidence on Potential Mediators

Open access
Janssen, Noortje P., Hendriks, Gert-Jan, Baranelli, Céline T., Lucassen, Peter, Oude Voshaar, Richard, Spijker, Jan, Huibers, Marcus J.H.·2021·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Introduction: Behavioural activation is an effective treatment for depression, but little is known about its working mechanisms. Theoretically, its effect is thought to rely on an interplay between activation and environmental reward. Objective: The present systematic review examines the mediators of behavioural activation for depression. Methods: A systematic literature search without time restrictions in Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL resulted in 14 relevant controlled and uncontrolled prospective treatment studies that also performed formal mediation analyses to investigate their working mechanisms. After categorising the mediators investigated, we systematically compared the studies’ methodological quality and performed a narrative synthesis of the findings. Results: Most studies focused on activation or environmental reward, with 21 different mediators being investigated using questionnaires that focused on psychological processes or beliefs. The evidence for both activation and environmental reward as mediators was weak. Conclusions: Non-significant results, poor methodological quality of some of the studies, and differences in questionnaires employed precluded any firm conclusions as to the significance of any of the mediators. Future research should exploit knowledge from fundamental research, such as reward motivation from neurobiology. Furthermore, the use of experience sampling methods and idiographic analyses in bigger samples is recommended to investigate potential causal pathways in individual patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000509820

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Avoidance is a risk factor for depression, anxiety, and stress, which can negatively impact the reward system and self-efficacy.

    “Existing literature in behavioral activation also supports this view, identifying the avoidance as a risk factor for depression, anxiety, and stress, which can negatively impact the reward system and self-efficacy.58”

    From Differential associations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes with psychological distress across racial groups. (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The “Looking beyond the BA Theory” section reports reduced reward-system function in depressed patients, and “Competing Theories” discusses self-efficacy in relation to behavioural activation for depression. Neither section identifies avoidance as a risk factor for depression, anxiety, or stress, or links avoidance to changes in reward processing or self-efficacy. The only exact mention of avoidance found is in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Lewinsohn PM. A behavioral approach to de- pression. Essential papers on depression. New York: New York University Press; 1974. pp. 150-72.
  2. Orgeta V, Brede J, Livingston G. Behavioural activation for depression for older people with or without cognitive impairment: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis of ran- domised controlled trials. Alzheimers De- ment. 2017; 13(7): 499-500.
  3. Janssen/Hendriks/Baranelli/Lucassen/ Oude Voshaar/Spijker/Huibers Psychother Psychosom 2021;90:85-93 92 DOI: 10.1159/000509820
  4. Grosscup SJ, Lewinsohn PM. Unpleasant and pleasant events, and mood. J Clin Psychol. 1980 Jan; 36(1): 252-9.
  5. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Me- diation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 58(1): 593-614.
  6. McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evi- dence based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2010; 5(1): 149-54.
  7. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depres- sion inventory -II. San Antonio: Psychologi- cal Corporation; 1996. pp. 490-8.
  8. Berridge KC, Robinson TE, Aldridge JW. Dis- secting components of reward: 'liking', 'want- ing', and learning. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb; 9(1): 65-73.
  9. Salamone JD. Functions of mesolimbic dopa- mine: changing concepts and shifting para- digms. Psychopharmacology. 2007 Apr; 191(3): 389.
  10. Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M. The experi- ence sampling method: flow and the founda- tions of positive psychology. Berlin: Springer; 2014. pp. 21-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssen, N. P., Hendriks, G.-J., Baranelli, C. T., Lucassen, P., Oude Voshaar, R., Spijker, J., & Huibers, M. J. H.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2020-09-08
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
85-93
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W3084264570
Cited by
71
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
behavioral activation, depression, therapeutic mechanisms, mediators, activation, environmental reward, reward motivation, mediation analysis
MeSH terms
Humans, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review