Cited by 25Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealth Services Management and Policy

Are the needs of people with multiple long-term conditions being met? Evidence from the 2018 General Practice Patient Survey

Open access
Rolewicz, Lucina, Keeble, Eilís, Paddison, Charlotte, Scobie, Sarah·2020·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate individual, practice and area level variation in patient-reported unmet need among those with long-term conditions, in the context of general practice (GP) appointments and support from community-based services in England. Design: Cross-sectional study using data from 199 150 survey responses. Setting: Primary care and community-based services. Participants: Respondents to the 2018 English General Practice Patient Survey with at least one long-term condition. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the levels of unmet need in GP and local services among patients with multiple long-term conditions. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of variation explained by practice and area-level factors. Results: There was no relationship between needs being fully met in patients’ last practice appointment and number of long-term conditions once sociodemographic characteristics and health status were taken into account (5+conditions−OR=1.04, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.09), but there was a relationship for having enough support from local services to manage conditions (5+conditions−OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.88). Patients with multimorbidity that were younger, non-white or frail were less likely to have their needs fully met, both in GP and from local services. Differences between practices and local authorities explained minimal variation in unmet need. Conclusions: Levels of unmet need are high, particularly for support from community services to manage multiple conditions. Patients who could be targeted for support include people who feel socially isolated, and those who have difficulties with their day-to-day living. Younger patients and certain ethnic groups with multimorbidity are also more likely to have unmet needs. Increased personalisation and coordination of care among these groups may help in addressing their needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041569

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tudor Hart's inverse care law states that people most in need of health care are least likely to seek it or receive it; the law reflects two mutually-reinforcing phenomena-worse health in deprived localities and barriers to accessing healthcare in those same localities.

    “Tudor Hart's (71) inverse care law states that people most in need of health care are least likely to seek it or receive it; the law reflects two mutually-reinforcing phenomena—worse health in deprived localities and barriers to accessing healthcare in those same localities (47, 48, 72, 73).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Palmer W, Hemmings N, Rosen R, et al Improving access and continuity in general practice. research report, Nuffield trust 2018. Available: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2019-01/improving-access-and-continuity-in-general-practice-evidence-review-final-update-01-2019.pdf [Accessed March 2020].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolewicz, L., Keeble, E., Paddison, C., & Scobie, S.
Affiliations
Nuffield Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Rolewicz, Lucina
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-11
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e041569
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3103314577
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
multimorbidity, unmet needs, general practice, primary care, community-based services, patient-reported outcomes, social isolation, frailty, ethnic differences, young patients, care coordination, individualized care, health disparities
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review