CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quiet quitting among healthcare professionals in hospital environments: a concept analysis and scoping review protocol

Open access
Kang, Jaejin, Kim, Hyekyung, Cho, Ok-Hee·2023·BMJ Open
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077811PMC PMC10660974
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Introduction: The post-COVID-19 pandemic era has seen a rise in ‘quiet quitting’, with employees limiting their efforts to fulfil assigned tasks without going beyond their designated responsibilities. The occurrence of quiet quitting in hospitals can have detrimental effects not only on organisational culture but also on patient safety and satisfaction. Therefore, the aim of this study is to define quiet quitting among healthcare professionals in hospitals through concept analysis, identify the associated factors and outcomes of quiet quitting, and conduct a scoping review based on this defined concept. Methods and analysis: This study will adopt Walker and Avant method for concept analysis and Aromataris and Munn methodological framework as well as the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s manual for scoping reviews. The concept analysis will follow eight steps: (1) choosing the concept; (2) outlining the objectives of the analysis; (3) recognising the concept’s uses; (4) selecting the concept’s defining attributes; (5) constructing a model case; (6) constructing additional cases; (7) defining the consequences and antecedents of the concept; and (8) determining empirical referents. This study used databases of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global for the English language, and NDSL, KCI, RISS, KISS and DBpia for the Korean language. Additionally, grey literature will be searched. Ethics and dissemination: This concept analysis and scoping review does not require ethical approval. The results of this study will be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077811

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Nseir, 2013, Post-pandemic disengagement: what is quiet quitting?, Ariz Nurse, 76, 8
  2. Yikilmaz I . n.d. Quiet quitting: A conceptual investigation. Anadolu International Conference on Social Science
  3. Toso, 2016, Patient safety culture in hospitals within the nursing perspective, Rev Gaucha Enferm, 37
  4. Walker LO , Avant KC . Strategies for theory construction in nursing, 6th edn. New York: Pearson, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kang, J., Kim, H., & Cho, O.-H.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Catholic Kwandong University (KR)
  • Kongju National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Ok-Hee
ORCID
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-11
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
e077811
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077811
PMC
PMC10660974
OpenAlex
W4388835473
Cited by
50
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
quiet quitting, healthcare workers, hospital staff, employee disengagement, patient safety, patient satisfaction, organizational culture, COVID-19 pandemic, concept definition
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Scoping Reviews as Topic, Scoping Reviews As Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review