Cited by 7Dental Health and Care UtilizationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceOral Health Pathology and Treatment

Factors influencing implementation and sustainability of interventions to improve oral health and related health behaviours in adults experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage: a mixed-methods systematic review

Open access
John, Deepti A, Adams, Emma A, McGowan, Laura J, Joyes, Emma C, Richmond, Catherine, Beyer, Fiona R, Landes, David, Watt, Richard G +6 more·2024·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Among people experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD), poor oral health is common and linked to smoking, substance use and high sugar intake. Studies have explored interventions addressing oral health and related behaviours; however, factors related to the implementation of these interventions remain unclear. This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence on the implementation and sustainability of interventions to improve oral health and related health behaviours among adults experiencing SMD. METHODS: Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EBSCO, Scopus) and grey literature were searched from inception to February 2023. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and extracted independently by two researchers. Quality appraisal was undertaken, and results were synthesised using narrative and thematic analyses. RESULTS: Seventeen papers were included (published between 1995 and 2022). Studies were mostly of moderate quality and included views from SMD groups and service providers. From the qualitative synthesis, most findings were related to aspects such as trust, resources and motivation levels of SMD groups and service providers. None of the studies reported on diet and none included repeated offending (one of the aspects of SMD). From the quantitative synthesis, no difference was observed in programme attendance between the interventions and usual care, although there was some indication of sustained improvements in participation in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: This review provides some evidence that trust, adequate resources and motivation levels are potentially important in implementing interventions to improve oral health and substance use among SMD groups. Further research is needed from high quality studies and focusing on diet in this population. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020202416.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080160

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing reviews focus on specific interventions, specific populations or service models, rather than systematically mapping implementation research across the oral health field.

    “Existing reviews focus on specific interventions (eg, school-based toothbrushing), specific populations (eg, adults experiencing severe and multiple disadvantages) or service models (eg, integration of oral health into primary care), rather than systematically mapping implementation research across the oral health field.22 24 25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Covidence. Covidence systematic review software;
  2. [48]Beaton L, Anderson I, Humphris G, et al. Implementing an oral health intervention for people experiencing homelessness in Scotland: a participant observation study. Dent J (Basel) 2018; 6: 68. 10.3390/dj6040068 30513716 PMC6313649 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
John, D. A., Adams, E. A., McGowan, L. J., Joyes, E. C., Richmond, C., Beyer, F. R., Landes, D., Watt, R. G., Sniehotta, F. F., Paisi, M., Bambra, C., Craig, D., Kaner, E., & Ramsay, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • NHS England (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim (DE)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
John, Deepti A
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2024-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
e080160
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390823961
Cited by
7
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (NIHR200415)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
oral health, health behavior, intervention implementation, intervention sustainability, trust, resources, motivation, substance use, smoking, sugar consumption, program attendance, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Health Promotion, Humans, Oral Health, Health Behavior, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review