Cited by 42Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Policy Implementation ScienceDelphi Technique in Research

A cluster-randomised quality improvement study to improve two inpatient stroke quality indicators

Williams, Linda, Daggett, Virginia, Slaven, James E, Yu, Zhangsheng, Sager, Danielle, Myers, Jennifer, Plue, Laurie, Woodward-Hagg, Heather +1 more·2016·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

Background: Quality indicator collection and feedback improves stroke care. We sought to determine whether quality improvement training plus indicator feedback was more effective than indicator feedback alone in improving inpatient stroke indicators. Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomised quality improvement trial, randomising hospitals to quality improvement training plus indicator feedback versus indicator feedback alone to improve deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis and dysphagia screening. Intervention sites received collaborative-based quality improvement training, external facilitation and indicator feedback. Control sites received only indicator feedback. We compared indicators pre-implementation (pre-I) to active implementation (active-I) and post-implementation (post-I) periods. We constructed mixed-effect logistic models of the two indicators with a random intercept for hospital effect, adjusting for patient, time, intervention and hospital variables. Results: Patients at intervention sites (1147 admissions), had similar race, gender and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores to control sites (1017 admissions). DVT prophylaxis improved more in intervention sites during active-I period (ratio of ORs 4.90, p<0.001), but did not differ in post-I period. Dysphagia screening improved similarly in both groups during active-I, but control sites improved more in post-I period (ratio of ORs 0.67, p=0.04). In logistic models, the intervention was independently positively associated with DVT performance during active-I period, and negatively associated with dysphagia performance post-I period. Conclusion: Quality improvement training was associated with early DVT improvement, but the effect was not sustained over time and was not seen with dysphagia screening. External quality improvement programmes may quickly boost performance but their effect may vary by indicator and may not sustain over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004188

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Williams, L., Daggett, V., Slaven, J. E., Yu, Z., Sager, D., Myers, J., Plue, L., Woodward-Hagg, H., & Damush, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Linda
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-08-24
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
257-264
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W1885024307
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IP1 HX001994)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
stroke care, quality indicators, quality improvement education, deep vein thrombosis prevention, dysphagia screening, hospital performance
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feedback, Hospitals, Humans, Inpatients, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Venous Thrombosis, Stroke, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review