Cited by 130Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gunderson, Craig G, Bilan, Victor P, Holleck, Jurgen L, Nickerson, Phillip, Cherry, Benjamin M, Chui, Philip, Bastian, Lori A, Grimshaw, Alyssa A +1 more·2020·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic error is commonly defined as a missed, delayed or wrong diagnosis and has been described as among the most important patient safety hazards. Diagnostic errors also account for the largest category of medical malpractice high severity claims and total payouts. Despite a large literature on the incidence of inpatient adverse events, no systematic review has attempted to estimate the prevalence and nature of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane library from database inception through 9 July 2019. We included all studies of hospitalised adult patients that used physician review of case series of admissions and reported the frequency of diagnostic adverse events. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted study characteristics and assessed risk of bias. Harmful diagnostic error rates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-two studies including 80 026 patients and 760 harmful diagnostic errors from consecutive or randomly selected cohorts were pooled. The pooled rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0.5% to 1.1%). Of the 136 diagnostic errors that were described in detail, a wide range of diseases were missed, the most common being malignancy (n=15, 11%) and pulmonary embolism (n=13, 9.6%). In the USA, these estimates correspond to approximately 249 900 harmful diagnostic errors yearly. Conclusion: Based on physician review, at least 0.7% of adult admissions involve a harmful diagnostic error. A wide range of diseases are missed, including many common diseases. Fourteen diagnoses account for more than half of all diagnostic errors. The finding that a wide range of common diagnoses are missed implies that efforts to improve diagnosis must target the basic processes of diagnosis, including both cognitive and system-related factors. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018115186.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnostic errors are as high as 10-15%, impacting patient health and system costs.

    “Estimates evaluate diagnostic errors as high as 10-15%, impacting patient health and system costs [1][2][3] .”

    From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunderson, C. G., Bilan, V. P., Holleck, J. L., Nickerson, P., Cherry, B. M., Chui, P., Bastian, L. A., Grimshaw, A. A., & Rodwin, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Gunderson, Craig G
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1008-1018
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W3015860778
Cited by
130
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
diagnostic errors, prevalence, hospitalized adults, patient safety, missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, medical malpractice, cancer, pulmonary embolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnostic Errors, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Prevalence, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review