The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress
Abstract
Background: A growing body of peer-reviewed studies demonstrate the importance of safety culture in healthcare safety improvement, but little attention has focused on developing a common set of definitions, dimensions and measures. Objectives: Specific objectives of this literature review include: summarising definitions of safety culture and safety climate, identifying theories, dimensions and measures of safety culture in healthcare, and reviewing progress in improving safety culture. Methods: Peer-reviewed, English-language articles published from 1980 to 2009 pertaining to safety culture in healthcare were reviewed. One hundred and thirty-nine studies were included in this review. Results: Results suggest that there is disagreement among researchers as to how safety culture should be defined, as well as whether or not safety culture is intrinsically diverse from the concept of safety climate. This variance extends into the dimensions and measurement of safety culture, and interventions to influence culture change. Discussion: Most studies utilise quantitative surveys to measure safety culture, and propose improvements in safety by implementing multifaceted interventions targeting several dimensions. Conversely, very few studies made their theoretical underpinnings explicit. Moving forward, a common set of definitions and dimensions will enable researchers to better share information and strategies to improve safety culture in healthcare, building momentum in this rapidly expanding field. Advancing the measurement of safety culture to include both quantitative and qualitative methods should be further explored. Using the expertise of traditional culture experts, anthropologists, more in-depth observational and longitudinal research is needed to move research in this area forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents
Reason, J. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315543543 · Cited by 4,430
Sexton, J. B., Helmreich, R. L., Neilands, T. B., Rowan, K., Vella, K., Boyden, J., Roberts, P. R., & Thomas, E. J. (2006) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-44 · Cited by 1,782
Integrative reviews of nursing research
Ganong, L. H. (1987) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770100103 · Cited by 1,296
Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations
Nieva, V. F. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii17 · Cited by 1,003
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2011) · Oxford Handbooks Online · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0064 · Cited by 688
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys
Colla, J. B. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014217 · Cited by 648
Five System Barriers to Achieving Ultrasafe Health Care
Amalberti, R., Auroy, Y., Berwick, D., & Barach, P. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00012 · Cited by 599
Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews
Kolbe, R. H., & Cooper, H. M. (1991) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172876 · Cited by 594
Relationship of Safety Climate and Safety Performance in Hospitals
Singer, S., Lin, S., Falwell, A., Gaba, D., & Baker, L. (2009) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00918.x · Cited by 528
Cited by
Reis, C. T., Paiva, S. G., & Sousa, P. (2018) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzy080 · Cited by 258
Alingh, C. W., van Wijngaarden, J. D. H., van de Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Huijsman, R. (2019) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007163 · Cited by 150
Garrouste-Orgeas, M., Perrin, M., Soufir, L., Vesin, A., Blot, F., Maxime, V., Beuret, P., Troché, G., Klouche, K., Argaud, L., et al. (2015) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3601-4 · Cited by 147
Jones, K. J., Crowe, J., Allen, J. A., Skinner, A. M., High, R., Kennel, V., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4453-y · Cited by 28
Hinrichs-Krapels, S., Tombo, L., Boulding, H., Majonga, E. D., Cummins, C., & Manaseki-Holland, S. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001796 · Cited by 25
“or system in place in which potential incidents could be reported nor recorded or monitored, which are the basic requirements for addressing patient safety concerns and adopting a ‘safety culture’ [29, 30].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Halligan, M., & Zecevic, A.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-343
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2148117753
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 23.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040964
- The paper
- Halligan, M., & Zecevic, A. (2011). Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.040964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.